Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Definitely not something that takes away from the game so I see why they didn't bother lol
I think that given the various ways that the rules of physics in the Outer Wilds universe differ from that of our own, it's completely reasonable that increased solar activity of a dying star could affect activity of a nearby volcanic planet, and to leave the explanation of exactly why this happens up to our imaginations. After all, there are numerous other things like planets with non-euclidean geometry, black holes inside a planet that exerts a fraction of the gravity of the star just nearby, time travel, black/white hole warping, etc about which the game gives us ample room to contemplate the details.
This game only works because it's an eccentric, mysterious abstraction of reality, not a completely logical and entirely explained simulation.
Not that there couldn't have been more of an explanation of this phenomenon, just that I don't think more is needed to fit the nature of the game as is.
Black holes seem to just work differently here. Dark Bramble is...basically supernatural. But given what we know in-universe there's just not as solid a reason for Brittle Hollow falling apart right now - especially since it's kinda easy to miss the explanation that is offered in game.
Definitely not a big fault though.
Yea, I agree, NBD. ::D