Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
That's your own poor opinion sadly.
oh no! the fictional science in my fictional video game isn't actually real science! oh no!!!!!
honestly, i was a little bummed when i got to the end because i knew there wouldn't be much more left to do in the game, despite that, i still find myself coming back to this game, start a new save and go again. its definitively a different type of game, which i am happy to see, the puzzles here do need some brain usage, since this game doesn't hold your hand in any way other than the ship log keeping track of things you've already found
and no, scientific accuracy is NOT what we came to this game for. yes, it does tap into real world cosmology, very loosely at that, but the sheer absurdity of this game's artstyle is what lets it stand out so much, do its own thing and be such a good storyteller without getting stale.
it wouldn't exactly be fun having to fly 100km straight up into space after each loop, would it? i guess it goes to show games can still look pretty even if its enough to give DeGrasse Tyson nightmares
i personally love this game as one of my all time favorites, it tried something new and did it so well. i can understand if this isn't your cup of tea with the focus on puzzles and storytelling, but at least i can explain why so many people love this game
Who would have thought that a game with a teleporting moon would need to be scientifically accurate? This game is obviously inspired by cosmology and quantum physics, but the scale of time, space, and quantum phenomenon are messed with significantly to make it work better as a game. OP says that the universe in game was trending towards a Heat Death scenario , but suddenly at the last moment switches to a Big Crunch scenario when the new universe is created .
But from my interpretation, there was no indication that a Big Crunch had ever occurred. The Eye is shown to produce objects that exist in a superposition of states that collapse into one when under observation, and the Eye itself is an entrance to some dimension made of these superpositions. When you enter the Eye you see the remaining stars go supernova and the universe go dark. The game likely takes inspiration from quantum tunneling here, which theorizes that there is a tiny, nonzero probability that particles can exist in states forbidden in classical mechanics. This could include forming a singularity to begin a new universe. Since you left the universe through the Eye, you remain the only observer left, and so by observing the possibilities for the new Universe that the Eye provides you collapse that possibility space into the new Universe and allow it to be born. The requirement for an observer isn't real science, but the possibility of all particles in our universe tunneling together to begin the universe anew remains feasible on the infinite timescale that is the heat death of our universe.
Regardless, the game doesn't need to nor should be scientifically accurate. It makes cool references to physics and does leagues better than most science fiction with its representation of gravity and inertia. Its as internally consistent as a time travel game can reasonably be, and includes some easter eggs for when you violate causality . But it never pretended to be Interstellar and try to simulate real world science.
> surprised to see scientific inaccuracy
Hmm, sounds like a skill issue. Outer Wilds is not a difficult game unless you are new to gaming in general or just not especially attentive. Maybe try out Dreamlight Valley or one of the Lego games to ease yourself in?
Happy new year!