Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But yes it's the AMD equivalent to DLSS and it's supposedly almost as good as DLSS 2.0 based on what I've read.
You can change the rendering resolution as you want until you find a balance of performance and appearance that you like.
Imo, try out DLSS, and various CAS combos, and select what you like best.
Edit: DLSS version 2, for games that support that, can provide a much better experience than DLSS or FidelityFX CAS and large downscaling can provide.
With DLSS, my framerate is higher, but I noticed blurriness at places. I seem to be avoiding that using 90% and CAS.
So, again, I suggest just trying out combos to find what you like for your specific system. :-)
AMD technology works with Nvidia, but Nvidia tech doesn't work with AMD. Has been the case for ages, hasn't it? AMD adopts open standards usually.