IGN gave 9/10 Review Score

[🍃🪻🪷Sylvie🩵🍸🍵]

It's interesting to see IGN gave 9/10 Review Score while other reviewers like Gamespot, Game Informer gave different review score.

IGN (9/10):
https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/09/10/shadow-of-the-tomb-raider-review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdEfROL2Wx8

Gamespot (6/10):
https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/shadow-of-the-tomb-raider-review-guerilla-girl/1900-6416982/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taXpT2Cb59U

Game Informer (7.5/10):
https://www.gameinformer.com/review/shadow-of-the-tomb-raider/in-the-shadow-of-something-greater

[Not In Use.]

35% Over 1080 Ti is nothing in 4K, Ultrawide or not .

Thank you .

[I Love Emma Stone]

Two words mentioned that I don't like: "Fewer Firefights".

This is very disappointing for me. I was expecting either an equal amount of combat as the previous games, or more.

But to find out that there is less combat has me seriously worried. A major red flag.

This is what happens though when a different developer takes over. Things get messed up.

[KRON]

Sean původně napsal:

Two words mentioned that I don't like: "Fewer Firefights".

This is very disappointing for me. I was expecting either an equal amount of combat as the previous games, or more.

But to find out that there is less combat has me seriously worried. A major red flag.

This is what happens though when a different developer takes over. Things get messed up.

You do know that Tomb Raider was never about combat, right? It was about, you know, tomb raiding?

[I Love Emma Stone]

Yes, However I loved the direction the reboot took.

[Billy Blaze]

I just copy/paste what I've written below the ACG review, especialy for the shmucks with their "But in the original TR games...":

The thing is, I didn't like RotTR as much as TR2013 because there were even less fights and more exploration.
Wouldn't be such a problem, but it hurts the replay value alot.
"Uncharted 4" did the same mistake by toning down the action in favor of more climbing and running around.
And since this climbing and walking is just interesting/challenging the first time, it's boring if you do it a second tme, except you haven't played the game for a year or two.

Yeah, people call someone like me a "CoD"-kid, even if I never played these titles.
But I just need my little bit of action, and when it comes to the newer TR titles, these bits of action are the only moments of "true gameplay".
These moments, where you have to concentrate and the outcome is different each time, even if it's just slightly.

And compared to the classic TR titles, the "adventure aspect" (climbing etc.) in newer games is mostly automated and barely deadly.
In older titles, no matter how often you've beaten the game, dying cause of a misjudged jump is still very possible.
So in these older titles, you have to concentrate all the way through instead of typing something on your phone while climbing.

[Krythic]

Sean původně napsal:

Two words mentioned that I don't like: "Fewer Firefights".

This is very disappointing for me. I was expecting either an equal amount of combat as the previous games, or more.

But to find out that there is less combat has me seriously worried. A major red flag.

This is what happens though when a different developer takes over. Things get messed up.

https://us.v-cdn.net/5020794/uploads/editor/kl/o3ke7q8iha95.gif

[AmAtic]

Easy Allies gave it a 8,5/10

[D-.-RAiL]

Sean původně napsal:

Yes, However I loved the direction the reboot took.

that was the direction that Rise took the first remake had far less combat.