Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Nothing I wrote is revisionism, unless you honestly believe that when HP Lovecraft writes of whites being a superior "aryan" race, and that all others follow a hierarchy of inferior races, including Asians and African that's the truth, then of course you'd accuse an anti-racist analysis of history of revisionism. Or you're assuming that when I write of Lovecraft being a racist, that we should be revising history to say he wasn't? Like I'm not sure if you're using "revisionism" correctly here. However, yeah, I'll stand by "racism is bad and shouldn't be tolerated, and anti-racism is good and we should be producing anti-racist material more often" and I have arguments about that.
ok? I mean, you're giving a history lesson that explains what was happening, and you say because it's happening that it was fine? For white supremacists of the 1800-1970's that acted out racist social policies they'd agree that's how things went and that it was fine. However, for black liberationists, they'd say that was happening and it wasn't fine. Heck, even Mohammid in 1968 would disagree that the N-word wasn't a derogatory slur: youtube.com/watch?v=B9LFmUVV0SY
I think you should follow history a bit more closely from the perspectives of those who were the subjects of colonial and white supremacist policy, otherwise you may fall into or continue that mindset. And that's not revisionist, that's listening to people who experienced what was happening, documenting it, and telling you how they felt and what they did.
Syndicalist, actually, which does include internationalism and anti-racism.
He also married a jewish woman, so not your classic 1940s nazi/racist.
So, he was racist, in the early days VERY racist but later adopted a softer position. And while the decline of civilization was one of his main themes, racism and class segregation were not.
As you can see most of the problems we face in nowadays are because of the government regulations,intervention,failed social programs and high taxes.
The only real way to "fix" is "shrinking" the size of government,giving people more freedom to people to do what they want with their own money.
Just because the US goverment is a corrupt and plutocratic mess which is not able to deliver a proper welfare system since WW2, it does not mean government intervention is always a bad thing.
Sadly being a based and repilled bible-thumper does not make up for a failing school system such as the Usa’s one.
Sounds like American capitalism still sucks.
"convinced the other white nationalists" I agree with the OP because he raised good points regarding the story/lore of the game.You can have political statements and so on but in this case feels like the devs are worried in pushing a political agenda rather than telling a story with a good narrative.
Also as a side note I'm from Brazil,one the most mixed countries in the world,why do you assume that just because I agree with the OP I'm a "white nationalist".Feels like you need to resort to ad hominem because you don't have any real arguments.
Government ownership is not what socialism is. I know a bunch of americans fell for this idea nd made posters about Obama being a socialist, but that's not what socialism is. By the way, american hospitals, homeless shelters and prisons are all privately-owned and your postal service will soon be too, so I dunno where you get off that government is bloated outside of police and armed forces.
Lovecraft had a political agenda when we wrote about race, so this still all boils down to "I prefer white supremacy to anti-racism" again. This argument has nothing new beyond that, which is why I'd write is only convincing white nationalists to not buy into anti-racism in video games.
Heh, there's a lot to unpack here, but 1) I've already explained how Lovecraft was political and a white supremacist, which means all Lovecraftian work is political and can either be based in bigotry or anti-bigotry, your "argument" brings nothing new and is more "ad hominem" than mine anyways, and 2) if you oppose anti-racism, you'd be an anti-anti-racist, which means... ___
Besides, if there's anything your military president in Brazil has taught us is that Brazilians can be racist too. And that's only the recent history.
Homeless shelters are usually operated by a non-profit agency or a municipal agency, or are associated with a church"That's the thing,the US has a mix of both private and public,therefore my argument still stands.
Yes you are right about Lovecraft,let's take an awesome(yet flawed game) that got the story and the "vibe" right : call of cthulhu dark corners of the earth.The theme of the story was about right and I would expect something similar with this game(horror&thriller) which is not case.
Please do state where do I've used ad hominem when writing about you.Yes I agree,brazilians can be racist,white can be racist,blacks can be racist,racism is (sadly) part of the human behavior.I judge people on the account of their character,not skin/religion/background and so on.
American capitalism still sucks.
For anyone else reading this terrible thread, socialism is not "the government owns things." Capitalism is when there is an exchange value attached to all commodities (ie. you pay for goods and services with money you get through selling your time and labour, or renting the time and labour or others), and ownership of the means of production are by a class (ie. capitalist class, industrialists, or nation-states). Socialism is when the working class have abolished private property from said classes and control the means of their production (ie. Catalonia 1936-1939). When the capitalist class (ie. governments) in a capitalist society (ie. America, where you have to use money to buy things by selling your time and labour) own some means of production (1/2 of every hospital/clinic, some postal and delivery services, a few schools, etc) then that is not socialist.
This equating socialism with the worse aspects of welfare reform or government ownership comes from the same gullibility that would believe supporting white power ideleogy is good for white working class people. Which is what OP and others fell for.
No it's not. It's taught. That could be your behaviour but it's not everyone's.
The Social Security program is a form of socialism;the government controls the money and decides when and how much the workes get back after—and if—they reach retirement age.You can't opt-out,you are forced to pay,you can't decide what you do with your own money.The same goes for several others government programs.
The government isn't capitalist because it does produce nor it has money of it's own,the government is supported by the tax payer.
I don't support socialism because it uses force and coercion to to achieve its goals,I am someone who stands for freedom and socialism is something goes against in what I fundamentally believe.
Nope,it's not how I perceive the world,just check my last reply.
Just because I don't agree with you that doesn't make me a "white supremacist",we were talking about some of the core features of the game that we din't like it and that does not make anyone a "white supremacist".
That is literally fascism, which is Mussolini argued should be called "corporatism" for this very reason. I don't even know why I'm explaining this to someone without the bare understanding of economic systems.
No. Governments owning things is not socialism Again, this is like explaining basic economics to a child. Socialism is something very different from government ownership of companies; it is the complete abolition of companies as we understand them, the abolition of money and exchange value, the collective ownership by all working class people - the government is not working class people nor can it be because they then would no longer be working class people.
The government produces when it owns things! This will get incredibly confusing to you when you believe that "government ownership of business is socialist" and "social programs by governments is socialism," because the government can own businesses and be an actor within capitalism (Adam Smith writes about this when describing capitalism to capitalists!). Social programs are so beneficial to capitalism because it 1) allows workers to reproduce their labour, especially more levels of skilled labour when they provide the training programs (ie. schools and colleges) to the capitalist class, 2) allows workers to survive to continue production by giving some funding to clinics and hospitals, and 3) gives people money to spend within the capitalist economy so that businesses can continue to generate money. Even american liberals explain this to other capitalists.
You don't even know what socialism is.
I doubt you even know what white supremacy is. This entire thread is:
And yet my example was about East Germany,therefore my point stands for a planned economy.
A social program in which you can't opt out,belongs to socialism,because it's a basic form of redistribution of wealth and as for of my understanding it does make part of the socialist ideology.
And how do you achieve something like that ? through the power of the state,by using force and coercion.
Yes we do have something like that it's called worker cooperative.
I've stated a couple examples on the "modus operandi" of socialism yet you seem to be focused on only a few of it's points.
The OP said the following points were the worse regarding the game :
Those are things that I wouldn't expect in a Lovecraft-based game,that's why I mentioned that other game,call of cthulhu.Because it's a game focused on the horror/thriller with a good story,that's what I was looking for in this game.
Where did I said that?please do quote me on that one.I've just said I din't like the political agenda and the out of place themes.
By all means you can have something on those lines if they're done right and how it is development within the game,which it seems this not the case with the game.