Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However this may or may not be based around learning of more events that took place by their hand, which I'm not sure exactly which game they took place in so I'll spoiler tag some things.
After learning about Hamel and what happened there... it's pretty hard to feel like the Nobility were justified in anything that took place at any point.
Even less so once they take royal family captive.
Oh, not to mention that there's no one with more status and tradition around than the Emperor, and they locked him and his family up as prisoners.
No, it's all about a privileged few upset about the loss of their exclusive privilege, and being willing to commit violence against the government because of it. *cough*
In terms of passing moral judgement from on high (as opposed to something like understanding the way the nobles think, or trying to find a way to prevent the war from happening), my reaction to "Our unfair, imposed-by-force hierarchy of birth is being torn down! The plebs are gaining power!" is ThenPerish.jpg
spoilers about CS3
According to a dialogue on CS3 between the Chancellor and the Emperor, not only Osborne was provoking then, but he actually wanted them to start a civil war
So yes "Nobles" were wrong to start wars, but long before we get to that point, they were wrong to dare call themselves "Nobles" and pretend they are superior in the first place.
Same exact thing also applies with "Royals" too.
All of them, "Nobles" and "Royals" alike, should either have to admit that they are no better than anyone else, and pledge never again to try and "Lord" their fake "superior" status over anyone, and have to surrender all of their unearned wealth that they were born into and which they gained as a result of their families having oppressed & exploited normal people for many generations.
Or else if they refuse to do those things, then they should all be quarantined onto a prison island where they live in squalor among each other and have no contact with the outside world where the normal people without delusions of grandeur and without unearned privilege live.
What makes a "noble" and/or "royal" in any way better and/or superior to anyone else?
The only real answer is: absolutely nothing!
The belief that there is something different and/or better about them is simply a ludicrous superstition.
And one which they use to oppress everyone else, and the normal people whose labor they leech off of like parasites, in order to keep themselves wealthy.
How is any of that not evil?
People are not born evil nor evil solely because of what social standing they're born into.
Their imprisoning of the royals was a foolish move, the entire concept of feudalism is that a king rules vicariously on behalf of god (in this case Aideos) and the nobility derive their authority from the monarch's divine right. Claiming sovereignty of the empire based on merely being a noble holds no weight at all, you might win a military conquest but you'll face endless unrest from the unjustified usurpation.