game is too expensive

[Porta]

I am sorry but the game price increases are insane, why keep raising it when you can hardly hold 1k players. I have had a few friends tell me if the game was cheaper they would try it but the current price for a unfinished game is outrageous.

[Phoenix‎ Rose]

because the game has quite a lot of content in the game now, with breeding, raids, clan battles, dojo re-battles, so while the price is a little high, it's still worth it because of how fun the game is to play.

[BorutoKageBushing]

this game must be f2p in the future, no much people are playing the game so, in twitch nobody is playing and is sad too

[Akephalos91]

Originally posted by Porta:

I am sorry but the game price increases are insane, why keep raising it when you can hardly hold 1k players. I have had a few friends tell me if the game was cheaper they would try it but the current price for a unfinished game is outrageous.

LOL

Sry, but really just LOL

It worth every cent

[Porta]

Originally posted by Akephalos91:

Originally posted by Porta:

I am sorry but the game price increases are insane, why keep raising it when you can hardly hold 1k players. I have had a few friends tell me if the game was cheaper they would try it but the current price for a unfinished game is outrageous.

LOL

Sry, but really just LOL

It worth every cent

no its not

[AnimeBrigade]

More fun, more challenging, more interesting story, more things to do end game, more things to do in general than anything pokemon has done in the past decade. If you cant afford it play something else or start saving up cause its worth more than most games especially pokemon. Its still cheaper than pokemon at that

[Wipkonijntje]

can't beleave ppl find this expensive.

compair this price to any pokemon game and its basicly pinuts and u get alot more contents aswell and the game is still in EA.

[Peppe_LePeu]

40 bucks is cheap a non pos f2p game. Especially in this genre with things like pokemon rehashes of games from a decade ago going for 60... good god, if anything they should be charging more with inflation as that 40 they earn stretches far less then it did even 6 months ago.

[raelynne63]

Originally posted by Butters:

Originally posted by Wipkonijntje:

can't beleave ppl find this expensive.

compair this price to any pokemon game and its basicly pinuts and u get alot more contents aswell and the game is still in EA.

But you know, this is not a Pokemon game. But okay lets compare this game with other AAA titles. Triple A games like Cyberpunk (December 2020), Monster Hunt Rise (2021) are $30, even Elden Ring (2022!!!) is $40 with a Steam Key. You trying to tell me this game (January 2020) is worth the same price as triple A titles? It's 2+ years, number of players are declining, it deserves a discount, especially in EA.

Actually the reverse is sometimes the case. Pokemon and those AAA titles are getting more sales and revenue and can charge less because of their guaranteed sales alone.

If you don't feel it's worth it now, wait a couple years and see if it costs less.

$43 is not an expensive game in my opinion. I'm thankful for digital game prices. I remember paying $100 for Phantasy Star 4 hard copy when it came out because it was so hard to find. Breath of Fire 2 was also hard to find in my area. When the SNES first came out, games were $80 and some of them pure crap.

$43 for a game with this much content is a fair price. There's been a lot of work put into this game and the devs work hard to fix bugs and maintain the game. Can't always say the same for bigger developers and higher priced games.

[Didaibr]

Ah so now unfinished indie games are worth the same price as finished AAA titles? That makes a lot of sense. And here you are again, gatekeeping the price of an unfinished game :clown:

first you talk about cyberpunk and now "finished AAA titles" lol
Monster hunter rise is just a port and elden ring sold more than toilet paper when covid started so yea they can start making discount!

---
And I see people talking about numbers of player like there is only steam player and its not cross-plataform, meanwhile in game there is alot of console players running around!

[bunnygum]

In my experience of spending way too much time and money into games, i'd say this is more of a $35 CAD game rather than a $49 CAD game. There's a decent chunk of content and the quality isn't bad but this genre doesn't deserve anything more than $40 CAD in my opinion.

[༺♥❀Lucina❀♥༻]

Oh i tough it was my imagination that the price raised hehe.

To be honest, i regreat not buying it early... and now that its high price , i cant afford it :c guess ill wait for a super discount or something good that i can afford
I just hope everyone is having fun n_n

[Col Doff]

i am agree with raising price with content added, but the game never got sale since it is in early access...

[Wolfguarde]

I've bought significantly worse quality games for a fair bit more, and gotten significantly less hours for the price I paid for them.

The game's not perfect. Nobody - devs included - will deny that. But if EA can get away with selling ♥♥♥♥ games for $70+, with minimal replay value and almost no innovation from sequel to sequel, I think Crema can comfortably get away with pricing their game for $40-50. It's got adequate mechanics and stuff to do for an online multiplayer game. The main thing it's lacking quality-wise is more and deeper content, and I don't see development just stopping at 1.0.

[orange]

yeah i like the game but they should really be selling it for much cheaper, i want more people to play and the price is a barrier

[Sakarov]

I guess a lot of people are spoiled by the bundles/free games/game pass/heavy discount/etc

If you don't want to pay for it then don't. Wait for release then there will be sales. But claiming the price is outrageous is pathetic.

Of the games i played Temtem is easily in the top10% of the best (full) price to content ratio.