Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/games/742490/announcements/detail/1662270614922317485
my post wasn't irrelevant since op thinks every nonogram should start with several 100% fillable lines when they shouldn't. since then I played all the gallery levels and 14 of the classic puzzles so far and all of them were logically solvable. looks like you have the game too, which levels do you think require guessing?
anyway, one of the early patches supposedty got rid of multiple solutions and one of the latest ones added a 'mark solvable' option, which highlights rows and columns where you can mark at least one cell.
not sure when I'll get to the 20s because I don't like that I have to unlock every classic puzzle one by one unlike in other games where I can play whichever level I want. if I make a mistake, I don't want to start over a huge 30-40-minute puzzle, would move to another, so I shelved the game a few weeks ago, hoping for a patch to get rid of this 'feature', which only made sense in gallery mode.
do you have screenshots or level names where you got stuck? and are you using the show solvable function?
if a row/column is highlighted, you should be able to mark at least one cell. you're clearly missing nonogram basics, so I guess I interpreted your original post corrently. did you do the tutorial?
there's nothing wrong with the puzzle on your latest screenshot, at least not at first glance. look at
the 11 6 column: count 6 from the bottom, add 1 for the dividing x (only in your head, you don't know where that x goes yet) and count 11, mark that cell, then count from the top and start marking after the already marked cell until you reach 11.
same for 10 3 1: count 1+1+3+1+10, mark that cell, then count to 10 from the top, mark the cells that are covered from both ends. now do this with the rest of the rows/columns, marking cells that have to be marked no matter which end you start with and you should be fine.