Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Its true cause Honor and Glory has it done the way that it was found out from footage from Camerons wreck explorations he has done.
I also was exploring the empty debris field behind the aft end of the bow and just happened to locate the crows nest bell just now. But one thing that is kind of bothering me also is that I am heading south to the aft end of the Bow but if I am moving south I should be heading towards the prowl of the Titanic as the bow of Titanic is facing slightly east of North with the aft end of the bow facing slightly south west.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0412/feature5/map.html
So I know this is still a work in progress and it is early access. I just dont want to come off as a smart a** or anything I just want to assure that they know what I am noticing with the exploration of the wreck site as of now.
Majority of photos from that period are actually of olympic and not Titanic. We found out that Titanic was like Olympic in this case cause she had the same window configuration. So how can you say the photo was not from the wreck but was an orignal photograph? How can you tell Titanic from Olympic when it was found out Titanic had the same layout of Olympic?
If you look at Titanic Ghost of the Abyss book which I have along with the DVD, the book on page 80 states "Only the forward portion of the first class Dining Saloon remains. The rest collapsed when the ship broke in two. (below) Despite the nearby destruction, undamaged ornate leaded-glass windows still cover the portholes and the cast -iron bases of tables rise from the debris and muck that litter the floor."
So explain to me how can the forward portion of the dining saloon remain but the bulkhead was destoryed? Explain to me how a photograph taken in 1911-12 be verified to be Titanic and not Olympic when it was found out Titanic had the same bulkhead as Olympic. If they are the same then you cant tell them apart so how do we know the old photograph was of Titanic and not just Olympic?
When you approach this logically you realize that what I said makes way more logical sense being found on the wreck to verify she was like Olympic in this area over a photograph taken in 1911-12 when majority of photos said to be of Titanic or marked as Titanic was really of Olympic.
https://youtu.be/UJQJkxD1Izg?t=22m45s
Go to 22:45
First off insulting someone does not sway people to your view so as of now you are full of ♥♥♥♥ in my eyes and anything you say holds zero weight with me.
You should educate yourself so called walls on ships are called bulkheads. Bulkheads are vertical walls on board ships so calling the forward bulkhead dividing the Dining Saloon and the Reception Room is the correct term. Wall is not the correct term.
Now kindly ♥♥♥♥ off.
I didnt even look at your so called evidence because of your childish petty insults to a reply that clearly went right over your head. So like I said kindly ♥♥♥♥ off cause you are not presenting anything to the discussion other than making childish petty insults.
Another thing why would I even entertain your opinion and beliefs as having any weight behind them when you are trying to tell me the bulkhead between the reception room and the dining saloon was a wall not a bulkhead. Then went on a rant about how the bulkhead doesnt exist anymore it was destoryed with the impact of the ocean floor. But yet the stained glass windows and wood columns and wood paneling of the forward section of the dining saloon are still preserved. But some how the wooden bulkhead dividing the two rooms are gone but everything else remains. Makes zero logical sense and doesnt agree with what we see on the wreck.
First off you are retarded, I said the BULKHEAD THAT HAS THE 3 ARCHES is COMPLETELY DESTORYED. The ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WALLS that have the stained glass HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT... IDIOT
I shouldnt entertain your troll ass but I need to say this, the bulkhead that you claim is destoryed was made of wood. The walls with the stained glass is made of wood. So explain to me how the lead glass windows remain un broken, how the wood paneling remains un broke, how the cast iron table bases are still attached to the floor but yet the bulkhead seperating the rooms are destoryed?
Tell me what destoryed this bulkhead but didnt destory the rest of the more delicate features that are right next to this bulkhead?
You keep using petty childish insults and now yelling because you have no leg to stand on. You dont know ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about Titanic, you only take and know what the two guys working on Titanic Honor and Glory claim and I hate to burst your bubble but they are liars themselves. I watched that video you linked out of curiosity and I didnt have anything better to do. They claim that is a rare photograph but yet that is part of the Father Browne collection which is the most well known collection photos of Titanic. They also proclaimed they were the first to figure out Titanic had different arch pattern than Olympic. So you are telling me two guys just happen to find a so called super rare photo even though its part of the most well known collection of photos onboard Titanic and they went on to make a ground breaking discovery of the bulkhead being different than Olympic but yet historians that have been researching Titanic for decades never figured it out? Ill tell you what I will do, tomorrow I will pull my Titanic Ship Magnificent Vol.2 book out and take a gander I bet it talks about the photo in question as well as the arch pattern. If it does then these kids didnt make any discovery as my two volume set predates their so called discovery.
Sorry but these kids are just enthuastic about this and they are Titanic fans but in the end I do not buy that they found something ground breaking that no historian figured out first when the photograph in question is part of a set of photographs taken onboard Titanic during the voyage.
So in closing you can think what you want but you throwing your little temper tantrum cursing and name calling and yelling tells me and everyone else that sees your post, that you dont know what you are talking about. Maybe one day when you've invested time in actually researching Titanic like I have maybe you will mellow out some and not be so angry when someone doesnt agree with what you believe to be right.
I dont think its planned to be released on steam. Would be nice but I dont think so. The three demos werent released on steam so I am inclined to believe the main game wont be either.