FNaF: Survival Logbook's details about FNaF 4 can change EVERYTHING!

[Kaleidio]

So I bought the Survival Logbook recently, and just like Dawko showed us... Mike drew Nightmare Fredbear. But since Michael is the big brother, and doesn't really have as big of an imagination as his little brother... how did he know every exact detail of the Nightmare Animatronics? I think this drawing is confirming who we are really playing as in FNaF4. Michael Afton. Here's my evidence:

- The bite victim dies in the Night 6 ending; so, how do we come back for a seventh night, and see Nightmare, who is obviously a canon character, if we're already dead?

- And, just like MatPat mentioned from scientific fact, a bite across the brain would cause you to no longer feel distress or would even knock you into an unconsious coma if too much damage is done.

- In the FNaF4 jumpscare, we hear a younger child's scream just before the game goes bloody and ends, right?

Here's what I concluded:

We don't play as the bite victim, but specifically the big brother Michael Afton. Michael apologized to the bite victim at the end of Night 6 and watched his brother die in the hospital bed right in front of him. Therefore, I believe Nightmare is actually death himself, but only because Michael saw death take away someone he loves using an animatronic (symbolically, of course.) This also explains why Nightmare looks more like an endoskeleton, because Michael Afton's imagination made it that way due to the fact that Michael knows the culprit of the bite itself (not of "how it became possible" a.k.a how the child was put into Fredbear's mouth) is the animatronic's robotic parts that helped crush his brother's skull. And every time we get jumpscared, Michael is actually remembering (or in better terms, "reciting") the very scream his little brother had when he shoved him into the mouth of Fredbear.

And by the way, for those of you who wonder, "Then why does the screen go bloody and red when we get a game over?" Honestly, when I have nightmares, I envision that kind of effect in the darkness of my bedroom the second I try waking up, so it's not far from reality (when it comes to how it feels to awaken from a nightmare.)

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Like I said: double-edged sword. He’s damned if he doesn’t give hints or if he doesn’t debunk theories, and damned if he does.

Well, he isn't necessarily damned if he doesn't... the more mystery the better the story in the old days when writing was the only way to convey one (or so they say.) Basically he's become a man who nobody listens to but will buy his stuff anyway.

Maybe I’ve just become bitter towards the story, or the theory community, but I just wish Scott would be more active in throwing hints our way. A good puzzle is one where the peices are visible and left to the player to put together. The FNaF story is a puzzle where all the peices are there, but they aren’t all clear, so people either don’t look hard enough, or look too hard, but can’t find them. I’m just as guilty of this as anyone.

All Scott needs to do to alleviate this is point us in the right direction, act as a cypher to the puzzle. Until he does, or something is revealed that allows us to more properly peice the puzzle together, I’ll just stick with my own personal take on the timeline. If evidence comes out that completely proves parts of my theory wrong (not someone else’s theory that is as comprised of conjecture as mine, but hard evidence like we got in the Logbook or FNaF 6), then I won’t be mad about it. I’ll just have to change my theory to fit the current information. Until then, I’m done with theorycrafting. It’s too much of a headache and a hastle for me to continue bickering with other people over small details.

[Kaleidio]

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

*nasal chortle*

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xYrG-Pwyf_E

a chortle and a laugh are two different things; this video is a laugh, i was trying to convey that rapid clicking noise you get when you want to laugh but you can't out loud to not draw attention ;-)

but seriously though, a chortle by dictionary definiton isn't noticeable in a definitive way.

[Kaleidio]

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Well, he isn't necessarily damned if he doesn't... the more mystery the better the story in the old days when writing was the only way to convey one (or so they say.) Basically he's become a man who nobody listens to but will buy his stuff anyway.

Maybe I’ve just become bitter towards the story, or the theory community, but I just wish Scott would be more active in throwing hints our way. A good puzzle is one where the peices are visible and left to the player to put together. The FNaF story is a puzzle where all the peices are there, but they aren’t all clear, so people either don’t look hard enough, or look too hard, but can’t find them. I’m just as guilty of this as anyone.

All Scott needs to do to alleviate this is point us in the right direction, act as a cypher to the puzzle. Until he does, or something is revealed that allows us to more properly peice the puzzle together, I’ll just stick with my own personal take on the timeline. If evidence comes out that completely proves parts of my theory wrong (not someone else’s theory that is as comprised of conjecture as mine, but hard evidence like we got in the Logbook or FNaF 6), then I won’t be mad about it. I’ll just have to change my theory to fit the current information. Until then, I’m done with theorycrafting. It’s too much of a headache and a hastle for me to continue bickering with other people over small details.

I love how you call theorizing a craft and not a science. You got the idea of why a theory is called a theory down pat, don't cha? ;D

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xYrG-Pwyf_E

a chortle and a laugh are two different things; this video is a laugh, i was trying to convey that rapid clicking noise you get when you want to laugh but you can't out loud to not draw attention ;-)

but seriously though, a chortle by dictionary definiton isn't noticeable in a definitive way.

Way to kill the joke...

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Maybe I’ve just become bitter towards the story, or the theory community, but I just wish Scott would be more active in throwing hints our way. A good puzzle is one where the peices are visible and left to the player to put together. The FNaF story is a puzzle where all the peices are there, but they aren’t all clear, so people either don’t look hard enough, or look too hard, but can’t find them. I’m just as guilty of this as anyone.

All Scott needs to do to alleviate this is point us in the right direction, act as a cypher to the puzzle. Until he does, or something is revealed that allows us to more properly peice the puzzle together, I’ll just stick with my own personal take on the timeline. If evidence comes out that completely proves parts of my theory wrong (not someone else’s theory that is as comprised of conjecture as mine, but hard evidence like we got in the Logbook or FNaF 6), then I won’t be mad about it. I’ll just have to change my theory to fit the current information. Until then, I’m done with theorycrafting. It’s too much of a headache and a hastle for me to continue bickering with other people over small details.

I love how you call theorizing a craft and not a science. You got the idea of why a theory is called a theory down pat, don't cha? ;D

Just wish more people understood this.

[Kaleidio]

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

a chortle and a laugh are two different things; this video is a laugh, i was trying to convey that rapid clicking noise you get when you want to laugh but you can't out loud to not draw attention ;-)

but seriously though, a chortle by dictionary definiton isn't noticeable in a definitive way.

Way to kill the joke...

Sorry, I really can't help myself at times....
I hope I didn't offend you at all. I really do. It's just that the video didn't really fit my message.

It's still really ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ funny though that spongebob's friends are really that recognizable ;D

[Kaleidio]

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

I love how you call theorizing a craft and not a science. You got the idea of why a theory is called a theory down pat, don't cha? ;D

Just wish more people understood this.

u p v o t e

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Way to kill the joke...

Sorry, I really can't help myself at times....
I hope I didn't offend you at all. I really do. It's just that the video didn't really fit my message.

It's still really ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ funny though that spongebob's friends are really that recognizable ;D

No offence taken, I just was reminded of Squidward’s laugh from your wording, and that was the best clip I could find of the one I was thinking of (tbh, I was thinking of the laugh he did in the Jellyfishing episode).

[Kaleidio]

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Sorry, I really can't help myself at times....
I hope I didn't offend you at all. I really do. It's just that the video didn't really fit my message.

It's still really ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ funny though that spongebob's friends are really that recognizable ;D

No offence taken, I just was reminded of Squidward’s laugh from your wording, and that was the best clip I could find of the one I was thinking of (tbh, I was thinking of the laugh he did in the Jellyfishing episode).

the one where he swallowed it and got stuck jellyfishing? ahh.... the nostalgia floods my mind right about now xD.
I'm gonna be heading offline. If you want you can friend me. It'd be nice to chat again knowing that both of us mean no harm to each other. I don't have good friends like that on here anyway, so...

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Цитата допису GradiusLover2000:

Цитата допису Sp4rt4n1295:

No offence taken, I just was reminded of Squidward’s laugh from your wording, and that was the best clip I could find of the one I was thinking of (tbh, I was thinking of the laugh he did in the Jellyfishing episode).

the one where he swallowed it and got stuck jellyfishing? ahh.... the nostalgia floods my mind right about now xD.
I'm gonna be heading offline. If you want you can friend me. It'd be nice to chat again knowing that both of us mean no harm to each other. I don't have good friends like that on here anyway, so...

I may consider it, but if we don’t have much to talk about other than FNaF lore, then I’m afraid I don’t see that happening since I’m not in any mood to discuss that any longer.