My FNaF Timeline! (This uses Game Theory's 'Final FNaF Theory' as a base, with FNaF 6 added)

[ExquisiteCorpse]

1970's: William Afton (Purple Guy) Starts killing kids, with his 1st victim being Henry's daughter, who becomes the Puppet.

-William kills ~10 more kids, but finds a new way to kill kids in the form of his new 'Funtime' animatronics. His daughter, Elizabeth, ignores her father's warnings to stay away from Baby and is killed by Baby. Her spirit then posesses Baby. 'Circus Baby's Pizza World' closes.

- Mrs. Afton (for an unknown reason) dies and becomes Ballora. William, filled with greef, runs away, leaving to two sons to run the house. William still kept in touch with his youngest son through a plush Fredbear with a walkie-talkie.

1983: 'Fredbear and Friends' opens with springlock suites of Fredbear and Spring Bonnie, and possibly Freddy, Bonnie, Chica and Foxy (aka the 'Rockstar' animatronics).

-Afton's youngest child is relentlessly bullied by his brother, Michael, and one day the brother's bullying goes to far and the child is bitten by Fredbear and hospitilised. William promises to 'put him back together', but the child dies. This child becomes 'Golden Freddy'.

-Springlocks are discontinued, but William continues killing kids by luring them into the back rooms of Freddy's pizzarias with the Spring Bonnie suit and killing them there.

1987: Jeremy Fritzgereld gets himself bitten by one of the animatronics (most likely Mangle) and free-roaming of the animatronics is banned.

-William knows the animatronics are after him, and tries to dismantle them. However, the childs' souls refuse to stay dead, and corner him in the back room. He tries to hide in the spring bonnie suit, but his haste coupled with the rain seeping in from the roof causes the suit to fail, and clamp down his body, brutally scaring him. The safe room is then sealed with William inside.

Years later, probs 1993: Michael Afton decides to fill his father's promise and put his sibling 'back together'. He goes to the underground Circus Baby's rentals to put Elizabeth back together. However, the animatronics fuse together to create Ennard and scoop Michael. After walking around on ther surface, Michaels skin starts to rot, and Ennard abandons ship. Somehow, Michael survives, and goes to put his father's other victims back together.

-Baby tries to take over ennard, but is eventually seperated and has to crall back to Baby's Rentals to fix herself.

- Meanwhile, Michael is travelling to the FNaF 1 and 2 Locations to fre the spirits of the children. He is successful. He then finds himself at Fazbear's Fright with William, now 'Springtrap'. Michael sets the place on fire to try and finish off William, but William survives the fire.

-Henry builds 'L.E.F.T.E' to capture the puppet, aka his daughter, and makes an underground maze to keep it, as well as the other spirits that need freeing.

-One by one, Baby, Springtrap and Ennard (now known as Molten Freddy) are lured into this maze.

-Michael takes up a job here, and after making sure everyone is there, sets fire to the place, freeing the spirits of Elizabeth (Baby), Henry's Daughter (The Puppet, Lefty) Mrs. Afton (Ballora, inside Molten Freddy/Ennard), and making sure that William's spirit is burning in hell.

THE END

What do you think?

[ExquisiteCorpse]

FNaF 2 happened AFTER the scooping of Michael though...

[Sp4rt4n1295]

William couldn’t have been springtrapped in 1987 because the current location was the FNaF 2 location, which the layout of the minigames suggest that it is in the FNaF 1 location that he dies in. It also wouldn’t make sense for him to die before FNaF 1 because the restaurant is clearly in a state of extreme decay, which would only happen if it were completely abandoned with no hope of restoring it and not just left to rot for a while. Plus, why would it make sense for William to dismantle the animatronics only to have them be rebuilt by the company than somehow miraculously get dismantled again by the time they are found and brought to Fazbear’s Fright? Why would a company that was reopening a restaurant just leave their newly redesigned animatronics in a decrepit restaurant to be damaged or destroyed?

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Good, but William killed five kids at the first Freddy's (FNaF 1 location) in 1983 THEN at the FNaF 2 location in 1987, in between FNaF 4 and 2, Michael was scooped. Michael couldn’t have gone back to FNaF 1 after 1993 because it would be closed (as said by one of the newspapers in the game, it closed by year's end) and yet we see it's still open in 1.

I still say Michael was scooped after FNaF 1, but ofher than that, I agree.

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Sp4rt4n1295:

I still say Michael was scooped after FNaF 1, but ofher than that, I agree.

Yeah. This user said they used MatPat's theory as a basis. Which is fine, except they mixed up the part of the beginning of MatPat's theory when Mat goes over all of the murders in the FNaF 2 minigames. He later establishes when they happen, but this user took what Mat first said and thought that all of the murders happened after Charlie's death.

However, MatPat is the one who pretty much came up with the theory that the FNaF 3 minigames take place before FNaF 1 and that William dies in Spring Bonnie and THEN is sealed away in the safe room, which is another point of contention in this thread.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

Ok, yeah, I did mess alot. And it could do with some refining. And, yeah I was just plain wrong on some points. But it is still, in my opinion, a believable theory. Thanks for pointing some stuff out, all try and fix it up a little.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Sp4rt4n1295:

However, MatPat is the one who pretty much came up with the theory that the FNaF 3 minigames take place before FNaF 1 and that William dies in Spring Bonnie and THEN is sealed away in the safe room, which is another point of contention in this thread.

...Which is impossible if Michael worked AFTERWARDS. MatPat's theory was great and all, but this is an issue; too many people watch his theories and just believe everything he says instead of doing their own research.

Hey, I didn't believe most of it at first, but the more i looked over the evidence, the more i started to realize how it could be a proper explanation. I just tried to add the fnaf 6 stuff.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

And just because don't dedicate my life to theroising about FNaF doesn't mean you have to correct every little detail I got wrong. It's just an explination I'm happy with.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

I didn't mean to sound harch sorry....

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Początkowo opublikowane przez theXmasBellyfish:

And just because don't dedicate my life to theroising about FNaF doesn't mean you have to correct every little detail I got wrong. It's just an explination I'm happy with.

We’re just trying to help clear up any issues with the timeline you made so that it makes more sense. We’re helping you make it better, not hating on you for making it.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

Thanks guys.

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Początkowo opublikowane przez theXmasBellyfish:

Hey, I didn't believe most of it at first, but the more i looked over the evidence, the more i started to realize how it could be a proper explanation. I just tried to add the fnaf 6 stuff.

Which was fine. Personally, aside from some things, I think it was probably his best FNaF theory since the 2nd one. I actually really liked the theory that we played as Michael in FNaF 3 (before 6 completely destroyed that theory.)

I still think FNaF 3 guard is Michael, but yeah, his recent theory is probably the best FNaF theory he’s made (even though I don’t agree with everything he said just like I don’t agree with everything in your timeline or the OP’s timeline), but while his FNaF 2 theory was good at first, it is completely derailed when he claimed Phone Guy to be Purple Guy even though it was painfully pbvious that the previous nightguard-turned-dayguard was the killer the whole time.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Sp4rt4n1295:

I still think FNaF 3 guard is Michael, but yeah, his recent theory is probably the best FNaF theory he’s made (even though I don’t agree with everything he said just like I don’t agree with everything in your timeline or the OP’s timeline), but while his FNaF 2 theory was good at first, it is completely derailed when he claimed Phone Guy to be Purple Guy even though it was painfully pbvious that the previous nightguard-turned-dayguard was the killer the whole time.

Honestly, aside from Phone Guy being Purple Guy, it was definitely one of his best.

I don't think we are Mike in 3.
1). Mike needs organs to breath.
2). In 6, Springtrap says, "You may not recognise me at first, but I can assure you it's still me." If we are Mike in 6, then he would have seen Springtrap in 3, so he knows what William looks like. Also, I don't think he would have not recognised him because of his new design. He would still know it's William, because how else could Mike know a giant golden bunny suit with a corpse in roaming around?

Ok I think I have reasons for both!
1) Through SL cannon custom night cutscenes we see that michael can survive without organs
2).... ok fine its not mike

[Sp4rt4n1295]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Necro:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Sp4rt4n1295:

I still think FNaF 3 guard is Michael, but yeah, his recent theory is probably the best FNaF theory he’s made (even though I don’t agree with everything he said just like I don’t agree with everything in your timeline or the OP’s timeline), but while his FNaF 2 theory was good at first, it is completely derailed when he claimed Phone Guy to be Purple Guy even though it was painfully pbvious that the previous nightguard-turned-dayguard was the killer the whole time.

Honestly, aside from Phone Guy being Purple Guy, it was definitely one of his best.

I don't think we are Mike in 3.
1). Mike needs organs to breath.
2). In 6, Springtrap says, "You may not recognise me at first, but I can assure you it's still me." If we are Mike in 6, then he would have seen Springtrap in 3, so he knows what William looks like. Also, I don't think he would have not recognised him because of his new design. He would still know it's William, because how else could Mike know a giant golden bunny suit with a corpse in roaming around?

With that logic, we obviously can’t be Michael in FNaF 6 since we hear a heartbeat. It’s clear he must’ve lost his abdominal organs, not the ones in his chest cavity, so sverything from the diaphragm down to the lower intestines, which is still a lot of space considering Ennard could easily mold himself to fit in such a space since he’s made almost entirely of wires.

Springtrap looks a lot more like Golden Freddy in FNaF 6 save for the ears. He looks pretty radically different to his design in FNaF 3. However, just like Whatever’s going on in FNaF 4, this is still pretty much up in the air for who we play as in FNaF 3 since we don’t see a paycheck or anything that would tell us the guard’s name, so we’ll just have to agree to disagree till Scott or a credible source can confirm things.

[ExquisiteCorpse]

OH YEAH it could be michael!

[ExquisiteCorpse]

I think that's why FNaF is so popular. We will probably never have a completely satisfying answer that answers every question.