Mr William Afton has lost all possible sympathy he might have had.

[I'm sorry... Goodbye]

As the game series went on, you lose any sympathy you might have had for this child killer. At first you think, "perhaps he went mad with grief because of the fnaf 4 kid dying" Then you are like, his daughter died. No wonder he tried to close the fnaf establishment and tried to kill kids for revenge. But then in the book, you learn more about him and how he is truly evil. And if that wasn't enough

But then you learn how his daughter was killed by the animatronics he built to kill kids. He was evil from the very start. And in fnaf 3, nobody was sure if springtrap was trying to get help (because his jumpscare wasn't particularly menacing) or if he actually was evil. When you learn the fnaf 3 guy was michael afton, his son. You have more reason to think that after 30 years of being locked in a room haunting a rotting and decaying suit. hes finally regretted his actions and started looking for forgiveness.

But then the second book came out, showing that despite being springtrap, he was still as evil as always.

And then in fnaf 6. He speaks, showing he is still as cunning and evil as ever. (which I don't understand lol, you think being locked up in a room for 30 years inside a rotten suit would make you see the error of your ways XD) And hes still completely fine killing his son michael in fnaf 3 and fnaf 6



So yeah, Mr William Afton has lost all sympathy he might have once had.

[76561198833417023]

Well...

Think about it this way... William Afton was not allowed at JR's. Why?

Let's just say that it wasn't a bar. What if it was just another one of those itty-bitty restaurants like in the books, where Charlotte, John, Marla, and the rest were eating.?
Say, something bad happened there and it was caused by William's family.

Alright. Let's say there are four children: Michael, older bro, crying child, Elizabeth.
What if at least one of those kids were responsible for it, and the blame went to William.
Say, the older brother scared the kids there so bad that William was blamed for it because, well... he's his son anyways.
So now William is mad at his son for doing so and is forcing his son to NOT shut the doors, to keep im in check.

If it was the older brother, then it would mean a Hell lotta sense.

If it was the older brother, he would seek comfort in his room since the incident, so as to not strike any bad mental blows with his father. And this means PRIVACY. He needs his privacy to relax, chill.
When William came home, and he locked the door, he was scared because, well... who wouldn't be afraid when you've done something wrong and your dad just comes bangin' on your door in the middle of the night? Trust me. I've been through that feeling of discomfort. (alas, my father broke down the door. Or at least the lock)
So... he tries to escape by breaking the galss from inside. And he ran out to someplace else that he's been to before that his dad doesn't like.

It wouldn't make uch sense if it was Michael, Elizabeth, or the crying child.

For Michael, let's just say that he's outside, watching his soap operas. In the game, Yellow Man (who I believe is William) says that he's been through a long day. So that could probably mean that this was in the FNAFSL timeline, as William sent Michael to check on them. Which means that this was after Elizabeth was gone and posessed Circus.

If it was the crying kid, then, there are multiple facts to disprove of this. And I have my rreasons.

1. The window. The person escaping must have been big enough to hit the glass. Big and strong. The timid, tearful crying child. Assuming that feeling depressed and always crying makes you weak, it would be less possible for the kid to escape in such a way.

2. The location. Where would the kid go to anyways? Seeing as it is rainy, he's living in the woods, and he's JUST A KID, he'd have nowhere to go, especially at night. Say he goes to the FNAF4 location. How could he remember it, and, most importantly, why isn't it raining in the fourth game? Saying that it's a little farther from the storm, it would be a few kilometers away. And we also see tracks outside when we move around the house (behind it). If there are marks, then they are fresh. And if there are marks, that means it's muddy. The rain just gets heavier as we progress, and if they haven't covered the traces yet, then it's a huge possibility that they're fresh.

3. The paws. Why would the kid wear paws? Assuming that this is a Nightmarenimatronic's foot, it wouldn't make sense for the child to be wearing them. It would suit the brother because of the size. Comparing the size of the crying child to the older brother in the FNAF4 minigame, the child is way tinier than him and, of course his feet are tinier. And anyways, if the crying child really did wear the paws, then that means that he's wearing slippers, seeing as he's in the house and all. Say, the kid's used to running in slippers. Ehh. Still huge slippers.

So... with this theory, it could mean that FNAF4 and SL happened at the same time, and why was it a MIDNIGHT MOTORIST arcade game anyway?

Maybe William was sending the crying kid to the FNAF4 location.

And also, why would William want to kill kids?

He's pretty sociopathic and more Annie-Wilkes type, so I'll answer it in their views.

Say, William is a sociopath. Or just normal.

Maybe he has a passion for mind-control.

Maybe he just wants to test out new programs so that he could learn how to build the Twisted anomatronics (which I assume are the nightmares, because they take form of the thoughts of a person based on their character; the crying kid saw them as nightmares because something related to the animatronics traumatised him in the past).

Maybe something bad had happened to him and he didn't want other kids to suffer the same way he had.

Maybe he actually LOVED his kids so that he's raising them right: spoiling them with plushies and whatnot.

In an Annie-Wilkes case, maybe he sees them as poor poor things. ORr just plain, annoying, deaaf, blind, cockadoodie brats. For you who have read MISERY by Stephen King, you might know why I said this.

And, truth be told, I might change a line in the book to match the FNaF story and games:

'This is William's Book of the Dead, isn't it?'

Well, that's just me as a long-talking lawyer defending (and accusing a little bit) William Afton.

[Stick]

Golden Fazbear Green님이 먼저 게시:

Well...

Think about it this way... William Afton was not allowed at JR's. Why?

Let's just say that it wasn't a bar. What if it was just another one of those itty-bitty restaurants like in the books, where Charlotte, John, Marla, and the rest were eating.?
Say, something bad happened there and it was caused by William's family.

Alright. Let's say there are four children: Michael, older bro, crying child, Elizabeth.
What if at least one of those kids were responsible for it, and the blame went to William.
Say, the older brother scared the kids there so bad that William was blamed for it because, well... he's his son anyways.
So now William is mad at his son for doing so and is forcing his son to NOT shut the doors, to keep im in check.

If it was the older brother, then it would mean a Hell lotta sense.

If it was the older brother, he would seek comfort in his room since the incident, so as to not strike any bad mental blows with his father. And this means PRIVACY. He needs his privacy to relax, chill.
When William came home, and he locked the door, he was scared because, well... who wouldn't be afraid when you've done something wrong and your dad just comes bangin' on your door in the middle of the night? Trust me. I've been through that feeling of discomfort. (alas, my father broke down the door. Or at least the lock)
So... he tries to escape by breaking the galss from inside. And he ran out to someplace else that he's been to before that his dad doesn't like.

It wouldn't make uch sense if it was Michael, Elizabeth, or the crying child.

For Michael, let's just say that he's outside, watching his soap operas. In the game, Yellow Man (who I believe is William) says that he's been through a long day. So that could probably mean that this was in the FNAFSL timeline, as William sent Michael to check on them. Which means that this was after Elizabeth was gone and posessed Circus.

If it was the crying kid, then, there are multiple facts to disprove of this. And I have my rreasons.

1. The window. The person escaping must have been big enough to hit the glass. Big and strong. The timid, tearful crying child. Assuming that feeling depressed and always crying makes you weak, it would be less possible for the kid to escape in such a way.

2. The location. Where would the kid go to anyways? Seeing as it is rainy, he's living in the woods, and he's JUST A KID, he'd have nowhere to go, especially at night. Say he goes to the FNAF4 location. How could he remember it, and, most importantly, why isn't it raining in the fourth game? Saying that it's a little farther from the storm, it would be a few kilometers away. And we also see tracks outside when we move around the house (behind it). If there are marks, then they are fresh. And if there are marks, that means it's muddy. The rain just gets heavier as we progress, and if they haven't covered the traces yet, then it's a huge possibility that they're fresh.

3. The paws. Why would the kid wear paws? Assuming that this is a Nightmarenimatronic's foot, it wouldn't make sense for the child to be wearing them. It would suit the brother because of the size. Comparing the size of the crying child to the older brother in the FNAF4 minigame, the child is way tinier than him and, of course his feet are tinier. And anyways, if the crying child really did wear the paws, then that means that he's wearing slippers, seeing as he's in the house and all. Say, the kid's used to running in slippers. Ehh. Still huge slippers.

So... with this theory, it could mean that FNAF4 and SL happened at the same time, and why was it a MIDNIGHT MOTORIST arcade game anyway?

Maybe William was sending the crying kid to the FNAF4 location.

And also, why would William want to kill kids?

He's pretty sociopathic and more Annie-Wilkes type, so I'll answer it in their views.

Say, William is a sociopath. Or just normal.

Maybe he has a passion for mind-control.

Maybe he just wants to test out new programs so that he could learn how to build the Twisted anomatronics (which I assume are the nightmares, because they take form of the thoughts of a person based on their character; the crying kid saw them as nightmares because something related to the animatronics traumatised him in the past).

Maybe something bad had happened to him and he didn't want other kids to suffer the same way he had.

Maybe he actually LOVED his kids so that he's raising them right: spoiling them with plushies and whatnot.

In an Annie-Wilkes case, maybe he sees them as poor poor things. ORr just plain, annoying, deaaf, blind, cockadoodie brats. For you who have read MISERY by Stephen King, you might know why I said this.

And, truth be told, I might change a line in the book to match the FNaF story and games:

'This is William's Book of the Dead, isn't it?'

Well, that's just me as a long-talking lawyer defending (and accusing a little bit) William Afton.

1:The books aren't canon. Idiot.
2:The Nightmares aren't real. Idiot X2.

[Big Doughy]

stickninja1015님이 먼저 게시:

Golden Fazbear Green님이 먼저 게시:

Well...

Think about it this way... William Afton was not allowed at JR's. Why?

Let's just say that it wasn't a bar. What if it was just another one of those itty-bitty restaurants like in the books, where Charlotte, John, Marla, and the rest were eating.?
Say, something bad happened there and it was caused by William's family.

Alright. Let's say there are four children: Michael, older bro, crying child, Elizabeth.
What if at least one of those kids were responsible for it, and the blame went to William.
Say, the older brother scared the kids there so bad that William was blamed for it because, well... he's his son anyways.
So now William is mad at his son for doing so and is forcing his son to NOT shut the doors, to keep im in check.

If it was the older brother, then it would mean a Hell lotta sense.

If it was the older brother, he would seek comfort in his room since the incident, so as to not strike any bad mental blows with his father. And this means PRIVACY. He needs his privacy to relax, chill.
When William came home, and he locked the door, he was scared because, well... who wouldn't be afraid when you've done something wrong and your dad just comes bangin' on your door in the middle of the night? Trust me. I've been through that feeling of discomfort. (alas, my father broke down the door. Or at least the lock)
So... he tries to escape by breaking the galss from inside. And he ran out to someplace else that he's been to before that his dad doesn't like.

It wouldn't make uch sense if it was Michael, Elizabeth, or the crying child.

For Michael, let's just say that he's outside, watching his soap operas. In the game, Yellow Man (who I believe is William) says that he's been through a long day. So that could probably mean that this was in the FNAFSL timeline, as William sent Michael to check on them. Which means that this was after Elizabeth was gone and posessed Circus.

If it was the crying kid, then, there are multiple facts to disprove of this. And I have my rreasons.

1. The window. The person escaping must have been big enough to hit the glass. Big and strong. The timid, tearful crying child. Assuming that feeling depressed and always crying makes you weak, it would be less possible for the kid to escape in such a way.

2. The location. Where would the kid go to anyways? Seeing as it is rainy, he's living in the woods, and he's JUST A KID, he'd have nowhere to go, especially at night. Say he goes to the FNAF4 location. How could he remember it, and, most importantly, why isn't it raining in the fourth game? Saying that it's a little farther from the storm, it would be a few kilometers away. And we also see tracks outside when we move around the house (behind it). If there are marks, then they are fresh. And if there are marks, that means it's muddy. The rain just gets heavier as we progress, and if they haven't covered the traces yet, then it's a huge possibility that they're fresh.

3. The paws. Why would the kid wear paws? Assuming that this is a Nightmarenimatronic's foot, it wouldn't make sense for the child to be wearing them. It would suit the brother because of the size. Comparing the size of the crying child to the older brother in the FNAF4 minigame, the child is way tinier than him and, of course his feet are tinier. And anyways, if the crying child really did wear the paws, then that means that he's wearing slippers, seeing as he's in the house and all. Say, the kid's used to running in slippers. Ehh. Still huge slippers.

So... with this theory, it could mean that FNAF4 and SL happened at the same time, and why was it a MIDNIGHT MOTORIST arcade game anyway?

Maybe William was sending the crying kid to the FNAF4 location.

And also, why would William want to kill kids?

He's pretty sociopathic and more Annie-Wilkes type, so I'll answer it in their views.

Say, William is a sociopath. Or just normal.

Maybe he has a passion for mind-control.

Maybe he just wants to test out new programs so that he could learn how to build the Twisted anomatronics (which I assume are the nightmares, because they take form of the thoughts of a person based on their character; the crying kid saw them as nightmares because something related to the animatronics traumatised him in the past).

Maybe something bad had happened to him and he didn't want other kids to suffer the same way he had.

Maybe he actually LOVED his kids so that he's raising them right: spoiling them with plushies and whatnot.

In an Annie-Wilkes case, maybe he sees them as poor poor things. ORr just plain, annoying, deaaf, blind, cockadoodie brats. For you who have read MISERY by Stephen King, you might know why I said this.

And, truth be told, I might change a line in the book to match the FNaF story and games:

'This is William's Book of the Dead, isn't it?'

Well, that's just me as a long-talking lawyer defending (and accusing a little bit) William Afton.

1:The books aren't canon. Idiot.
2:The Nightmares aren't real. Idiot X2.

No need to call people idiots

[Stick]

Old sport님이 먼저 게시:

stickninja1015님이 먼저 게시:

1:The books aren't canon. Idiot.
2:The Nightmares aren't real. Idiot X2.

No need to call people idiots

Anyone who uses the books for a theory has that coming