Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Like, keep 9 provinces and vassalize the rest?
Kinda like Crusader Kings has a demesne limit and the rest are vassals
I mean you still get benefits from taking over.
You should consider the extra provinces as normal 'lands' and the governed ones to be 'bastions' that should not be lost, I move them according to my frontlines to make sure that I can make the provinces have better stability. your oldest provinces will most likely have quite decent amount of standing because they won't be rebelling even when you are getting high amounts of war exhaustion from prolonged war efforts they tend to be in the positives while the newest additions can be negative, the likelihood of the AI going a round trip all the way back or to bypass regions entirely to pillage is extremely small as well.
also, more lands = more chance of mercenaries spawning in your lands when starting wars, mercenaries are quite valuable to make short work of a smaller nation, or to prevent the worst outcomes when dealing with multiple nations or a large nation with alot of attack vectors.
This was a good answer and interesting read :)