Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
0 
Report this post
If you got enough guilds and heroes you could potentially also place a tournament ground and do a combi tournament, those can earn you a lot of money.
While it gets more and more expensive placing them, I'd suggest you place atleast one guardhouse next to each sewer, because ratmen can mean the death of your settlement if they keep stealing your money.
Gimme solution, guys. Pfff!
For me this mission was one of cases of impossible difficulty hardcore.
I honestly don't get people who ask solutions and easy ways on forums. What is the point of gaming then? I thought it's about having fun not play through as fast as you can.
Once you've dealt with the monster lairs, pop down 2 trading posts and a guard tower or two for each one, then just wait. You should have the gold in a few in-game days.
And when you know what to build it's done. Every solution/walkthrought is not an auto-win, but they make your game easy to play through as quick as possible.
I honestly don't get what is the point of playing games then.
I can get if you're a speedrunner. But they don't do it in the first playthrought anyway.
To assume someone asking for a walkthrough means they're taking the easy way out is the frankly, the height of arrogance. You have no idea what their circumstances are. Maybe they are looking for the easy way, to blow through the game as quickly as possibly. Or *maybe*, they've tried everything they can think of and still can't get it, to the point that IT'S NOT FUN for them anymore. What you think is the point of games is not going to be everyone's view on the point of games and trying to assume intent when you have nothing to go on is horrible.
I don't like shaming arguments, like a lot. Because they are just a low-intellectual way of passive-aggressive hate. Justifying ability to label people. I get that you are not on the hate side, but it's a mechanism of opening hate and fights.
How can you be certain why I'm mocking people? You know nothing about my motives to do so. How can you blame me of arrogance before you have any clue about my intentions? Why do you think that harmless mocking is enough to blame me like I've made a serious sin?
That's an issue of shaming argument.
And why do you think I have actual judgement and heavily condemn them? ;)
And games are not always about fun. Art has different forms. Suffering can also be fun, and that's a good way to have memorable experience and rich emotions. If you can overcome challenge without sweat and suffering, achievement looses in value.
And as a human being I have a right to disagree with opinions of others. Difference in opinions and approaches is what makes life colorful. Like ability of combining mechanics and solving economical problem differently keeps interest in Majesty glowing and makes people coming back to the game.
This isn't learning about the economy - otherwise it would be a beginner scenario. This is taking what you may *know* about the economy and going to the "extreme" condition of having a time limit and a vast amount of gold. And if the person can't figure it out on their own, it's better to help them along than condemn them for looking for help.
Trying to defend your actions is even the lower level of passive aggressivness. You get called out on it and immediately have to reply "oh, that's not what I was saying" or "it was harmless". Gag me. I gave you the benefit of the doubt with my initial reply and when you *still* repeated your judgement, it was clear it's not "harmless" at all. Question a person's motives once for asking for help, yeah, I'll let it slide. Do it twice or more and your intentions are clear enough.
Again, your view. Suffering's not for everyone. And again, you don't know how much they have already "suffered" to that point to begin with.
To be sure, of course it's your right *to disagree*. But condemning? Shaming? Rebuking? others *because* you disagree and that they don't play the game the way *you* think it ought to be played is not.
It's learning the economy. You should know that in RTS games whole campaign is a learning process. At the beginning phase there is a hint to build two marketplaces. Here they give you a hint about elves. And no, game designed in a way for them to figure it out on their own. That's the point. I would've agree that helping people when they can't figure out something themselves is a good thing, in real life. Here it's a game design. Not every game meant to be played through by everyone. And loosing is a part of fun factor. Including facing challenges you can't overcome.
I'm not trying to defend my actions. I'm explaining that there is more to mocking about taking easy pass than awful case of a person who really believes that he is better than others because he's passed the game. I don't owe you such an explanation, btw. Just see that you're an intelligent person, and decided to tell you this.
When a teacher mocks you that you won't pass the exam, it doesn't necessary means he is harassing you. It could be that he wants you to pay attention to importance of exam. To trick you, provoke into being interested in passing it, invested into the problem. There is a difference in the tone. Same with hardcore culture of video gaming. There is a reason to it. And please don't ruin it, unless you are 100% sure that you have an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who is mocking others to feel better about himself.
SJWs and SJW magazines like kotaku promoted that whole console gaming is "toxic", full of selfishness and hatred. But I think you know that real source of hatred and harassment is the very SJW movement. And unlike harmless friendly mocking, they are really bad people, who cause real harm with bad intentions.
That's why I've been placing a bait of provocation. ;) The suffering in video games is part of a fun, that gives you strong emotions. It's similar to horror genre in this regard.
I'm not condemning, shaming, etc. I'm mocking. There is a difference in degree and tone. Surely it should be provocative enough to make people invested. But that's it.
Second, I don't see mocking. If it was there, it certainly didn't come across as it. You said twice "I honestly don't understand people asking for solutions and easy ways" and "honestly, what's the point of games then?". So if you're asking "honestly", you're being serious and truly asking for an answer.
Tangent: If a teacher is "mocking", either he's a bad teacher or he has such a rapport with his student(s) that he can get away with it because they know that's his nature. The latter certainly doesn't apply here, so I'm going to conclude that your use of "mocking" is the former and in very poor taste, if that's really what it was supposed to be.