Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
It is a theory. Incorrect, according to established lore. "Factual possibility". That's cute. Never heard that before.
Again you are mistaken. There is no indication that the ideal masters are daedra. Everything stated in Elder Scrolls lore states that nobody knows what exactly they are.
Indeed. Sheogorath was Jyggalag. Once defeated, he was able to reconstitute himself and was free from the curse that the other daedric princes placed upon him. What happened then was that the Champion of Cyrodiil eventually became a daedric prince himself. Ascended mortal is not an uncommon origin for a deity in roleplaying games.
Yeah, guess what's cuter...
Those people who stick to the most blatant of facts and ignore everything else which also stands up to scrutiny. Established is that spirits are able to be killed, turned into something mortal, and those mortal things or creatures may become Aedra or Daedra as well. The Cycle of spirits is covered extensively in Skyrim through every hint, allusion, and substance of what we still call fact and official canon. Daedra can die. When I say 'factually possible' I simply mean it is not impossible. I acknowledge we have not seen it, but that is why they are called Daedra, not because they can always be immortal under all circumstances, even the ones that killed the Aedra. A Daedra may commit suicide one day, and lo and behold, we have a dead Daedra, perhaps a new race or feature to Nirn, and the day proceeds. Until then, it is theological fact. Daedra are capable of dying. Some are even Aedra still.
Some of the Daedra are less evil, and chose not to die. But their goodness like Aedra proves the Daedra are only those who survive, those who continue to live. A trick will kill them. Sheogorath may have his revenge by driving them to their grave, or the constant bickering will lead to something drastic. None of these situations occur, but are plausible and realistic to the established canon. Think...Don't just say "Well generally they are immortal..." The only distinction between Aedra and Daedra is that the Daedra have not died, not that they cannot.
That's all nice, but you still cannot escape....
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Daedra
You cannot argue with word of god, which is what you are doing.
I have been a part of wikis before, they don't always allow for you to stare at the subject matter and figure it out when stated in only so so a way. Practically, generally, normally....That is what HAPPENS!!! Yes! But under the correct, possible, 100% accurate circumstances, you can have a Daedra completely die and become an Earth-Bone or Race. Step back and think of the 'What ifs'. They are not true in that they didn't happen. Yet they are indeed possible and predictable given the facts we can gather besides the one of many details involving Daedra which addresses their usual lifespan in Mundus. They can die in Oblivion for all I care. But they can die.
Annotation. Word of god.
Again, word of god is superior to word of Melletch. Sorry.
I quoted "Aedra and Daedra" earlier: "As part of the divine contract of creation, the Aedra can be killed. Witness Lorkhan and the moons. The protean Daedra, for whom the rules do not apply, can only be banished."
*This* is in-game, in-universe fact. You are merely using syllogisms. Aedra are spirits, Aedra can die. Daedra are spirits, Daedra can die. You may as well say that butterflies are dragons, because they both have wings. Oh, wait! Butterflies can die! Butterflies are Aedra!
Yeah, I have seen the page. You are quoting a book that is written for humans and elves in-universe, you know. From the mortal side of things Daedra cannot be killed. I am not denying that. I am agreeing with the book and established canon. However, just as the Altmer cannot understand how Talos can become a god, even when it is in the theology of their religion and the knowledge concerning the Dragonborn, there are facts not directly stated in those books. As it would defeat the purpose of the book to say Daedra can be killed when it is not historically possible, even if technically a possibility, they do not tell the mage, warrior, or thief to try and kill a Daedra in full. It is technically impossible with any approach that they may make and is orthodox.
However, an unknown, unorthodox, or comparable method to what killed the Aedra can technically still turn a Daedra into creation. They simply refused the bargain, and few other ways have been alluded to in order to kill these god-like beings. Although Talos did not slay Molag Bol completely, he very well could have. Lorkhan, as per established canon you can find on a wiki too, was in fact killed by another. Aedra are able to come back enough to help at times, and Daedra die enough to leave everyone alone. But there is a way for them to change, to die, just like the Aedra. It is written in "The Monomyth" and "Aedra and Daedra" in spite of being left unsaid. It is clear, it IS logical, and there are too many things against simply quoting the blunt, mortal surface of the theology in the world. It is not speculation, it is easy to see and figure out from paying attention.
And the word "Aedra" and the word "Daedra" are just words. The distinction was made by the elves in their language. It only indicates one is alive and immortal still, but the other is dead and was always capable of dying. It is more like taking two butterflies, calling them different names, and saying because one is dead and the other is alive, the latter cannot die.
That is severely twisting evidence. I am not just mentioning books. I am referring to the Skaald who calls the Daedra "Poor Creators" on Solthseim, since they refuse to kill themselves and instead morph creation itself into werewolves, their atronach bodies for themselves, and vampires, biles, and other unpleasantries.
Oh, yes, I am ignoring everything. From the books which deal with up-front, mortal dealings with the Daedra, to the Fire, Frost, and Storm Atronachs, to the fact Dibella's immoral side should have made her a Daedra, to Malacath who used to be an Aedric spirit before torture which changed him and the Orsimer, to the fact Meridia could have chosen to be an Aedra with her righteous streak, to the Dragonborn with an immortal dragon soul in a mortal's body, to like dragons who are also mortal and immortal, Aetherius and Mundus, and to the fact spirit, body, mortality, and immortality are all exchanged by all entities in The Elder Scrolls throughout time, whether dying and going to Sovngarde, turning to Earth-Bones, or transforming into Sheogorath, the Daedric Prince of Madness.
One can kill a god, if one stops believing in god.
Is belief not, after all, the source of a gods power ultimately?
Nope. God is God. With power stronger than your belief it is just belief.
Your loss, not mine. This is really easy to understand and if they said it more directly in the game or one of its books you would do a 180.
If it was canon that daedra are mortal then I would regard daedra being mortal as canon. Very good.