Disturbing New Trend On Skyrim Nexus

[hitchshar]

Sorry to bring this up, but I don't think I'm the only one who is a little creeped out by the new child mods with naked bodies being uploaded by certain individuals on the Skyrim Nexus site.
They are little girl 'follower' mods, which in itself is ok, but these are now created with the Dimonized UNP body replacer, which is meant to replace adult female characters' vanilla body underwear so they are naked, breasts, vagina, pubes etc. People who have complained about these mods have been banned or warned by the moderators of the Nexus with even the moderators themselves 'endorsing' these sick mods.
The Dimonized Female Body Replacer link: http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/6709/?
An example of the disturbing mods now being uploaded on the Nexus:
http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/74682/?
Surely this is illegal even if it is CGI? It's sexualising children and something should be done about it. I for one have informed the necessary authorities.

[The King Possum]

wiki vs merriam-webster, LMAO! ever heard of a real dictonary? maybe try the oxford dictonary or something other than a website that anyone can change. being nude is not "to make sexual in character or quality" have these fake, fictious, digital characters done any kind of twerking, yes twerking can be considered sexual as you are moving your butt in a way that is meant to arouse someone, or moving their digital bodies in such a way that would lead someone to believe they were being sexual? or are these fake fictional characters just nude. the witcher series has sexualization of men and women in it as Geralt is having sex but a mode that makes something nude is not sexualizing anything, it is just showing the fake digital human body as it was digitally created or modded. if Japan is treating children as sexual objects and there laws say it is okay then it is fine. it is called different cultures. morality is different for every culture and no on culture is right in the way they do things except in their own minds. perhaps if the fake digital characters were doing something that could actually be called sexual there might be a conversation but it is not like any children in real life in a country where it is illegal has been put into a sexual situation for the mod.

Originally posted by Martin:

The King Possum: Sexualize "To make sexual in character or quality.". See also Sexualization (Wiki). also "Manga and anime: Japan still treating children as sexual objects." etc

[The King Possum]

well, I am unsubscribing from this pointless conversation. I just can't believe wiki was put up against merriam-webster, that was too much for m to handle. have fun, learn the meanings of words people and if it ain't a real human there can't be a crime to report.

[Martin]

The King Possum: You are twisting words and meanings for your own twisted agenda. Sexualize "Make sexual; attribute sex or a sex role to:" Oxford dictionary. A computer model made to represent a prepubescent child with breasts is making that model/image sexual and in turn sexualising children. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/73925/? I do not subscribe to your immoral relativism...

[Gwumpy Fwog]

Im curious whats the difference between a child body and a small human? also what if they were some kinda pygmy dwarf frankly it doesnt bug me just dont download it

[Dr. Atrocious]

Originally posted by Martin:

The King Possum: You are twisting words and meanings for your own twisted agenda. Sexualize "Make sexual; attribute sex or a sex role to:" Oxford dictionary. A computer model made to represent a prepubescent child with breasts is making that model/image sexual and in turn sexualising children. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/73925/? I do not subscribe to your immoral relativism...

It doesn't look sexual though. It just looks like a little girl. I really find it strange and disturbing that you think it's sexual because it has small breasts. If it was not the mod author's intention to make the child look sexual, which it isn't, then there's nothing wrong with it. And like others have been saying, if it bothers you that much then just don't install it.

[Dariken]

She's adorable!

[Xalaron]

Hard to take anything RaveDZ says seriously in defense of child porn when his avatar is a loli.

[spookophonic™]

i don't mind the nude mods for females or males, its just seeing "teenage follower mods" in skimpy clothing, its just too damn weird for me. they try to justify by saying "people die early in those days", wtf??.. some of those mods have childish faces and revealing outfits.. etc.. i stopped downloading mods from them for quite some time, i took a peak at the site and still see the same weird mods. yet if you say something about it on the site, *Insant Ban*..

[Dr. Atrocious]

Originally posted by Xalaron:

Hard to take anything RaveDZ says seriously in defense of child porn when his avatar is a loli.

Is it sexual because it's an animated little girl?

Seriously, how is this thread not closed yet? It's just attracting ignorant weirdos that are insecure about animated children.

[Ilja]

Time to give some background for this conversation.

Few years back there was a project, where peoples made a child mod with "real" meshes and skeleton. This caused a big ruckus in the community. Some mod authors pulled their mods out from both Nexus and adult modding site, determined that they would not be used with such project.

Ruckus cleared the air, when peoples in different sites had to figure out their policy. In the end, the "real" body for characters replacing child characters, or allowing playable child character got banned. Authors of the mod that caused the problem pulled it out, fixed their work and re-uploaded it with a new form.

That has been the policy around. Adult modders have gone far enough to enforce it. They have made it so that any mod that removes the essential flag from child characters or allows a playable child character blogs the usage of their mods. That is a policy I agree with.

The problem with mods in question now is that they are using adult character skeleton modle and adult character meshes. Despite of being teenagers, characters can be read in ages of 18-19 as well. This is what causes the problem; this is a mod picturing young females, but not a mod that affects to child character status. Any one could create these characters with RaceMenu, BodySlide and XPMSE.

They are still presented as young women and not as children. Things may be different, if Bethesda had added a category for young characters (which they didn't). Now there are only three human categories to go with: Child races, Adult races and Elder races. While mod does not fall under child race category, only way to treat it is as part of adult race. This is why it is hard to interfere with using adult character bodies with these characters.

Are the body replacement mod needed? No. Most players consider them as underage characers, so I personally thingk that body replacement mods should use nevernude meshes. Everyone can switch the body without the mod to CBBE, UUNP, UNP (etc.), but giving direct nude mesh support for these characters in Nexus is not a good idea.

[i]

I already hate those modders. If I see an ENB user with Anime hair/Meshes I close the video. Instantly

[Martin]

Ilja: Interesting. I really don't care about other people's justifications for these sexualised children mods (I can't find any), I have pulled my mods out from Nexus. http://martinjamesmods.blogspot.co.uk/

[Phyrric]

Originally posted by Martin:

Ilja: Interesting. I really don't care about other people's justifications for these mods, I have pulled my mods out from Nexus. http://martinjamesmods.blogspot.co.uk/

Seeing the mods you have uploaded, it's not really that big of a loss.

[Martin]

CompletedQuill: Ford Dawnguard Overall is several months work alone... You have done what?

[Phyrric]

Originally posted by Martin:

CompletedQuill: Ford Dawnguard Overall is several months work alone... You have done what?

''You're not a chef so you can't complain about my food!''