hey does anyone know how to get the dlc's for oldrim?

[Makkis]

im unble to find them, i think that theyre unlisted just like oldrim (non se skyrim)
Edit: thanks guys :) found em

[Falro the Great]

http://store.steampowered.com/app/72850/

[Titanium]

Yeah you just go onto the store page, you can get to this on the link that guy sent or by going via your game library, or they can be clicked on in the page for the game in your game library.

[Lilith Vampy]

What a total rip off bathesda, they hid the old skyrim and left it with a release prices, SSE is inferior anyway

[John]

Again people, search for steam keys on third party sites, just get them as cheap as possible.

[Surmene]

Originally posted by John:

Again people, search for steam keys on third party sites, just get them as cheap as possible.

This.

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

What a total rip off Bethesda, they hid the old skyrim and left it with a release price, SSE is inferior anyway

Fixed that for you. Also, if SSE is inferior because it has 64-bit support resulting in a more stable game, then ok.

[Lilith Vampy]

Originally posted by Surmene:

Originally posted by John:

Again people, search for steam keys on third party sites, just get them as cheap as possible.

This.

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

What a total rip off Bethesda, they hid the old skyrim and left it with a release price, SSE is inferior anyway

Fixed that for you. Also, if SSE is inferior because it has 64-bit support resulting in a more stable game, then ok.

Okay buddy, you're really gonna step there with me eh? First off bethasda did a DIRTY job with the new HD textures, that's the reason why you fuc-k-ing replace it for optimized ones (THAT MODDRRS DID BETTER) for the vanilla. As for stability, we have enboost, i don't think i need to explain you what that does. I can get better graphics with old skyrim and have the same performance cost of SSE vanilla (pathetic). I'm currently running 350 mods, if that's not stalibility i don't what is, also i'm pretty sure over 60% of my load order is old skyrim exclusive and will always be. What were you talking about stability again? I don't think you'll be needing that if you are playing without mods, if you catch my meaning.

[Surmene]

Well, at least you used the right your. *Bethesda *Modders* *stability Anyway, default Skyrim SE graphics are pretty much ho hum so if you want to use an ENB, fine. I don't care since I didn't see any improvement since Oldrim crashed for me just the same. You can't see the fact SE is 64-bit meaning more RAM can be used than just four GB. I won't go back to Oldrim since I crash far less in SE. It's a better stable game simply put vanilla or modded. Whatever mods that didn't port already I ported myself. Oh, and I'm not your buddy guy.

[Lilith Vampy]

Originally posted by Surmene:

Well, at least you used the right your. *Bethesda *Modders* *stability Anyway, default Skyrim SE graphics are pretty much ho hum so if you want to use an ENB, fine. I don't care since I didn't see any improvement since Oldrim crashed for me just the same. You can't see the fact SE is 64-bit meaning more RAM can be used than just four GB. I won't go back to Oldrim since I crash far less in SE. It's a better stable game simply put vanilla or modded. Whatever mods that didn't port already I ported myself.

Do you even know what an enboost does? This advantage you get from the 64bits engine (uncapping the 3.9gb to a higher value), omce you get ENBoost it makes no difference, actually no, Oldrim on ENBoost is even more stable since not only uncap the old engine limitations but you also tell it how to use it properly according to your hardware.
If you think SEE graphics look good just because they added some over gloryfied god rays a few plants and a washed out badly resized textures then you probably never saw a pretty skyrim. And if your skyrim was unstable perhaps it could've been your feault no?

[Surmene]

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

Originally posted by Surmene:

Well, at least you used the right your. *Bethesda *Modders* *stability Anyway, default Skyrim SE graphics are pretty much ho hum so if you want to use an ENB, fine. I don't care since I didn't see any improvement since Oldrim crashed for me just the same. You can't see the fact SE is 64-bit meaning more RAM can be used than just four GB. I won't go back to Oldrim since I crash far less in SE. It's a better stable game simply put vanilla or modded. Whatever mods that didn't port already I ported myself.

Do you even know what an enboost does? This advantage you get from the 64bits engine (uncapping the 3.9gb to a higher value), once you get ENBoost it makes no difference, actually no, Oldrim on ENBoost is even more stable since not only uncap the old engine limitations but you also tell it how to use it properly according to your hardware.
If you think SE graphics look good just because they added some over glorified god rays a few plants and a washed out badly resized textures then you probably never saw a pretty skyrim. And if your skyrim was unstable perhaps it could've been your fault no?

Enough to know I saw no improvement in my game in terms of stability. Results may vary. This is with a Bash Patch and Loot. Graphics aren't a big priority for me. I use the Dolomite Weather mod in SE and that's the only one that changes up the look of the game. Nevertheless, I like SE better since it doesn't crash so much and I don't have to invest so much in terms of optimization and stablility.

[Lilith Vampy]

Originally posted by Surmene:

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

Do you even know what an enboost does? This advantage you get from the 64bits engine (uncapping the 3.9gb to a higher value), once you get ENBoost it makes no difference, actually no, Oldrim on ENBoost is even more stable since not only uncap the old engine limitations but you also tell it how to use it properly according to your hardware.
If you think SE graphics look good just because they added some over glorified god rays a few plants and a washed out badly resized textures then you probably never saw a pretty skyrim. And if your skyrim was unstable perhaps it could've been your fault no?

Enough to know I saw no improvement in my game in terms of stability. Results may vary. This is with a Bash Patch and Loot. Graphics aren't a big priority for me. I use the Dolomite Weather mod in SE and that's the only one that changes up the look of the game. Nevertheless, I like SE better since it doesn't crash so much and I don't have to invest so much in terms of optimization and stablility.

Again, using the "my game crashed" as an argument for SSE. Got it for free and will never use it again! Real modders couldn't care less about it that's why there so few. Go on love's lab and look for SSE mods, it's EMPTY, it's not just lover's lab, go on nexus too, Oldrim has almost 6x more mods than SEE if that doesn't say anything, i don't know what will. My point still stands If you have console standards by all means use it

[Surmene]

I can't help if you don't like the reasons why I like SE more. I got it for free too. Yes, there are fewer mods compared to Oldrim but quantity doesn't equal quality. I don't use consoles so I can't have "console standards."

[Lilith Vampy]

Originally posted by Surmene:

I can't help if you don't like the reasons why I like SE more. I got it for free too. Yes, there are fewer mods compared to Oldrim but quantity doesn't equal quality. I don't use consoles so I can't have "console standards."

It's not a matter of liking it or not when something is directly better. "FEWER" such generosity. How do you know oldrim mods are of inferior quality, tested them all?

[Surmene]

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

Originally posted by Surmene:

I can't help if you don't like the reasons why I like SE more. I got it for free too. Yes, there are fewer mods compared to Oldrim but quantity doesn't equal quality. I don't use consoles so I can't have "console standards."

It's not a matter of liking it or not when something is directly better. "FEWER" such generosity. How do you know oldrim mods are of inferior quality, tested them all?

Subjective. I'm not answering your query since it doesn't involve me saying quanity =/= quality.

[Lilith Vampy]

Originally posted by Surmene:

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

It's not a matter of liking it or not when something is directly better. "FEWER" such generosity. How do you know oldrim mods are of inferior quality, tested them all?

Subjective. I'm not answering your query since it doesn't involve me saying quanity =/= quality.

Having a console ammount of mods for your version is subjective sure. "but quantity doesn't equal quality" I'm pretty sure you didn't mean skyrim was one of the case, ooh, thank godness. I know tons of amazing mods that will never be ported, does that add them the bad quantity pool of mods as well?

[Surmene]

Originally posted by Fake Hero:

Originally posted by Surmene:

Subjective. I'm not answering your query since it doesn't involve me saying quanity =/= quality.

Having a console amount of mods for your version is subjective sure. "but quantity doesn't equal quality" I'm pretty sure you didn't mean skyrim was one of the case, ooh, thank goodness. I know tons of amazing mods that will never be ported, does that add them the bad quantity pool of mods as well?

No.