81 peak players?

[ExplosiveBolts]

Where is the modern audience?

[Savatage79]

45 people in game lmao it's so nice when the modern idiot audience shows up

[First Mate]

Publicado originalmente por ArtyD42:

For people wondering how to know how many people are actually playing this game:
https://steamdb.info/app/721180/charts/

I don't make the numbers, I just read em.

83 peak, Oh noooooooooo hahahahaha

[Fafnersbane]

I just can’t get over the EU funding. Norway isn’t even in the EU, nor is the UK, whose state television has been propping up the game. No reason I or you should be paying a single cent, krona, zloty or forint for this thing.

[Chukki]

Publicado originalmente por Fafnersbane:

I just can’t get over the EU funding. Norway isn’t even in the EU, nor is the UK, whose state television has been propping up the game. No reason I or you should be paying a single cent, krona, zloty or forint for this thing.

At first I wanted to buy it, write a mean review and refund. But then I thought - best way to deal with is is just to ignore.

[Owndizzel]

Saw some gameplay footage and i just gotta say....theShit i took this morning has more "content" in it than this game does.

[Dozell]

24 hours later and the positive most "helpful" still have almost no likes while the negative ones have around 1.5k likes per... How does Steam judge what is helpful? It feels like they are suppressing the reviews.

[Kondor999]

Even Detroit: Become Human has thousands of concurrent players several years after release. This pile of crap HAS to be money laundering. Who would greenlight this?

[Butcher]

Publicado originalmente por Kondor999:

Even Detroit: Become Human has thousands of concurrent players several years after release. This pile of crap HAS to be money laundering. Who would greenlight this?

The managers of guys who like numbers similar to yours.

[Anticitizen 1]

This is getting down to 15 player lows. Just for comparison, Half Life 2 which is a single player game that is 2 decades old at this point, get up to 1,000 concurrent players.

[[TW]Sergeant Beanbag]

Publicado originalmente por Anticitizen 1:

This is getting down to 15 player lows. Just for comparison, Half Life 2 which is a single player game that is 2 decades old at this point, get up to 1,000 concurrent players.

You are comparing Dustborn with an all time classic.Which is not fair at all.

Here's my take:

Even a siht game, a commerial disaster-"Aliens:Colonial Marines" has a current 47 players in-game compares to Dustborn's 16 player in-game count.

Which shows how huge the "modern audiences " truly were.


(Info from steamdb.com, 8/29/2024 13:59 pacific times.)

[bukkie661]

Publicado originalmente por TWSergeant Beanbag:

Publicado originalmente por Anticitizen 1:

This is getting down to 15 player lows. Just for comparison, Half Life 2 which is a single player game that is 2 decades old at this point, get up to 1,000 concurrent players.

You are comparing Dustborn with an all time classic.Which is not fair at all.

Here's my take:

Even a siht game, a commerial disaster-"Aliens:Colonial Marines" has a current 47 players in-game compares to Dustborn's 16 player in-game count.

Which shows how huge the "modern audiences " truly were.


(Info from steamdb.com, 8/29/2024 13:59 pacific times.)

It's not unfair. This game is based on modern values, with modern production sensibilities, created by modern people aimed at a modern audience. Even if it situated itself at the fashionistas of the avant-garde like it did, then it still should've done better than a two decades old game that retained 1000 players concurrent.

Seeing as the game did have its cheerleaders the question is why those cheerleaders didn't put their money where their mouths were. I would really like to pick the brain of a Dustborn cheerleader that didn't buy the game, but cheered it along during production while running defense for the devs.

We weren't ones stabbing the devs in the back- they know who we are. Dustborn was killed by its cheerleaders, the very same people that celebrated these brave and stunning devs.

[Butcher]

Publicado originalmente por bukkie661:

Publicado originalmente por TWSergeant Beanbag:

You are comparing Dustborn with an all time classic.Which is not fair at all.

Here's my take:

Even a siht game, a commerial disaster-"Aliens:Colonial Marines" has a current 47 players in-game compares to Dustborn's 16 player in-game count.

Which shows how huge the "modern audiences " truly were.


(Info from steamdb.com, 8/29/2024 13:59 pacific times.)

It's not unfair. This game is based on modern values, with modern production sensibilities, created by modern people aimed at a modern audience. Even if it situated itself at the fashionistas of the avant-garde like it did, then it still should've done better than a two decades old game that retained 1000 players concurrent.

Half-life 2 not only certified hood classic, but also got crapton of mods. X-COM: UFO Defense is another possible comparison which got more players than Dustborne.

[Jazzratoon]

19 people in the game. It's doing numbers, guys.

[First Mate]

Publicado originalmente por Jazzratoon:

19 people in the game. It's doing numbers, guys.

Dev computers with the game running in the background should not count.

[bukkie661]

Publicado originalmente por Butcher:

Publicado originalmente por bukkie661:

It's not unfair. This game is based on modern values, with modern production sensibilities, created by modern people aimed at a modern audience. Even if it situated itself at the fashionistas of the avant-garde like it did, then it still should've done better than a two decades old game that retained 1000 players concurrent.

Half-life 2 not only certified hood classic, but also got crapton of mods. X-COM: UFO Defense is another possible comparison which got more players than Dustborne.

I bet that the OG Skyrim has more players than Dustborn, LOL