Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Less, there'd be streamers hare playing this for views.
That the product flopped as hard as it did doesn't lessen the above. I do feel that an investigation into the studio should be conducted to find out what exactly happened with the grants. Disaster flops like this usually point at money-laundering.
This is the main example why they have to ruin other franchise, if they create something from scratch, nobody cares
Getting funds to make a game about over the ocean country, taxpayer money well spent.
81 is actually a lot for a game created to nosedive. I guess among the 81 are some of the devs, their gay partners and a few other LGBT activists that currently don't have the PC power to play good games like Wukong.
There are many more European games that have received funding that way as well. With the way that European finances work, not applying for grants and sponsoring (or failing to secure) just means that many projects just can't happen. The latter happens quite a lot too.
Hating on Dustborn for having received funding because of its political slant is a blatant double standard.