Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But I will say that I agree with you on more immersion is needed for future TW games especially the upcoming TW3K.
Or the realisation that they sucked and were irrelevent, and thus that getting rid of them makes for a better experience, old supporters be damned.
Just play the old games then. Jeez.
I don't understand, what is exactly lacking/wrong with the family tree as presented in ToB? Were you even aware that it does have one?
It has all the bells and whistles you expect. Family members (each with their own traits) pass away, offspring are produced (legitimate or bastard), generation succeeds generation... this is literally all there is to the essentials of the family tree.
You also have the political functions as introduced in Attila, such as assasination and embezzlement. Heck, you even get new features such as handing out estates to generals and governors, in order to keep them loyal, as well as the addition of retinues and followers to enhance the RPG element. Can't get much more Crusader Kings-esque than those two features.
Honestly, I am very curious to see why you think the family tree is inadequate in this game. You say it needs to be "fleshed-out," but I honestly can't imagine what more improvements can be made towards it.