Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It really depends on play style though.
In picking a faction, it's not only about roster, but cultural traits, position on the map, and campaign victory conditions. Each of the five cultural groups has distinct advantages over the others, and as a corollary, that means each will have weaknesses or extra obstacles to deal with that the others do not have.
It does make me idly wonder whether Valve keeps all threads ever made in steam forums active forever?!
If they do I find that both reassuring and terrifying.
But on the upside steam forums could well be just one of Gabe's experiments testing whether millions of humans (most of which exhibit less intelligence than goldfish) pounding away at keyboards into the ether for millions of years will ultimately produce another Shakespeare.
In other words, forum threads and such can only be as old as the internet infrastructure hosting it is itself, that is to say, not that old. A thread made in 2005 wasn't very old at all, sociologically speaking, in 2010, or even 2020, heck even a thread on some forum from like 1998 wasn't truly that old till recently.
But, we are approaching a time now where threads will be thirty, forty then fifty years old. This will allow for a very interesting social dynamic that is basically unprecedented.
Like if a bunch of guys were sitting around an office break room talking about Nixon in the waning of his Presidency of the U.S.A., that conversation is lost to the ether; but these kinds of conversations today tend to happen in text, whether on a forum, a YouTube thread, a blog comment thread, or text messaging, making their retrieval at least technically feasible, if not downright easy.
So looking back on people's thoughts on, say, Donald Trump in 2020, will be possible in 2070, fifty years later, in a way entirely different from trying to look back in 2020 to something from about fifty years earlier (c. 1970).
That will be really odd to experience, IMO.
The social media thing is going to have a really weird transition too. Currently, the oldest social media exploiters are not technically that old, but that window is closing fast.
Like, say you're a young woman who basically monetizes her looks, ie. goes after simps: even assuming she got started right when the infrastructure made this feasible (c. 2010), that's twelve years, so an early-twenties something woman is now in her thirties. What is going to be funny moving forward, is that these women will soon be in their forties, fifties, etc. Similar with the men. Say some guy monetizes doing stupid stuff online: how's that going to go as he ages?
In other words, are people going to be watching a 60 year old "Dude Perfect" doing stupid crap? Lol. How about a fifty year old woman doing a lap dance on Chaturbate?
Obviously, the most likely scenario is that these people will retire from their "careers," and we're beginning to already see that. The thing is, for like every three who "made it" and did make a "career" as such, there were like seven hopefuls who failed; and of the three who did pull it off, it'll be surprising imo if even one of the three manages to actually handle their money and affairs well going into later life, as opposed to just becoming a misery index statistic.
People see social media metaverse as something alluring and viable now largely because it has not had enough time to manifest an end state: it's all about dreams and hopes, potentials and what-ifs, not long term, sober results.
Very soon though, we'll be entering a period where there will have been enough time lapse to broadcast, publish and post not only the "journey," the young-and-hopeful side, but the actual results, ie. people getting old, fat, malinvestment, disillusionment, diagnosed with "old people" medical stuff, and (what will be especially interesting to watch) *competing with same personality types of a younger demographic*.
It's going to be sad, and it's probably going to even get ugly in many cases.
Green; Tacos; Reggae