Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Voodoo steals all their game ideas though, all their games are clones, so I'm not trying to defend their practice.
Voodoo is claiming that this is a subgenre just like match3 is, and look all the match3 games out there. I don't know anything about Voodoo, but *legally* they may be correct; it would take an actual (expensive) court action to decide for sure. Their legal theory claim is not at all ridiculous on the face of it.
*Morally* is a different question, so people can decide for themselves whether to boycott cloners like Voodoo.
Trade rag "Variety": "Goldman Sachs-Backed Cloner Uses War Chest, Ad Buys to Overshadow Original Game" https://variety.com/2018/gaming/features/donut-county-hole-io-apple-1202866615/
Polygon coverage that in part quotes from the Variety coverage along with their own material: "Donut County lookalike is number one on the App Store" https://www.polygon.com/2018/6/25/17501882/donut-county-game-knockoff-ben-esposito-holeio
P.S. For the record, I own Donut County and do not currently own a Voodoo game -- I'm just trying to shed some light on the legal issues.