First Person Actual ADSing

[frank]

Has this been requested before? Why did they not do it in the first place? it would be dope tho.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

It's been discussed. Yes it should have it.

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Its not there because the game was designed to be played in 3rd person.
Making weapons that were never designed to be used like that requires a lot of development focus and spending.

Next, if they did people would complain about the weapon spread because your bullets dont really go straight. Pretty much only a couple of weapons fire directly where you are aimming and everything else has a spread. So if they make ADS possible people would complain about spread next.

What we have is a lot more than I expected to begin with.

[Мя.Вяощп [FIN]]

yes i want to waste time adsing and not see anything

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

yes i want to waste time adsing and not see anything

You mean like almost every current 1st person game? Yes.

[Мя.Вяощп [FIN]]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

yes i want to waste time adsing and not see anything

You mean like almost every current 1st person game? Yes.

yes adsing in this game where seeing is more important than aiming

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

You mean like almost every current 1st person game? Yes.

yes adsing in this game where seeing is more important than aiming

Your comments are unclear. I guess your point in scopes and ADS are not needed in this game? That's not true at all as I play more than 1/2 the game sniping with their weak zoom.

[Мя.Вяощп [FIN]]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

yes adsing in this game where seeing is more important than aiming

Your comments are unclear. I guess your point in scopes and ADS are not needed in this game? That's not true at all as I play more than 1/2 the game sniping with their weak zoom.

i think its unnecessary and a massive waste of development time for nothing. Instead of them wasting time on something that is just an obstruction i would rather get a new map or some new weapons

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Your comments are unclear. I guess your point in scopes and ADS are not needed in this game? That's not true at all as I play more than 1/2 the game sniping with their weak zoom.

i think its unnecessary and a massive waste of development time for nothing. Instead of them wasting time on something that is just an obstruction i would rather get a new map or some new weapons

Well, I believe your opinion is in the minority here. If they offer it, you don't have to use it. If they don't offer it, no one can use it. Let's see.........

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

i think its unnecessary and a massive waste of development time for nothing. Instead of them wasting time on something that is just an obstruction i would rather get a new map or some new weapons

Well, I believe your opinion is in the minority here. If they offer it, you don't have to use it. If they don't offer it, no one can use it. Let's see.........

Thats not really good logic.
Development time wasted on a feature that doesnt improve the game.... development on more content that expands game?

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by (N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★:

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Well, I believe your opinion is in the minority here. If they offer it, you don't have to use it. If they don't offer it, no one can use it. Let's see.........

Thats not really good logic.
Development time wasted on a feature that doesnt improve the game.... development on more content that expands game?

That assumes ADS/Scopes will not improve the game and lead to wasted programming time. Many disagree with that. My point is the same.

[[0121-8C] Whiskey-1]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by Мя.Вяощп FIN:

i think its unnecessary and a massive waste of development time for nothing. Instead of them wasting time on something that is just an obstruction i would rather get a new map or some new weapons

Well, I believe your opinion is in the minority here. If they offer it, you don't have to use it. If they don't offer it, no one can use it. Let's see.........

I mean, he isnt wrong, this is basically a horde shooter being also pseudo-stealth, as the game changes if youre doing things silently or loudly, ADSing to use actual sights other than the sniper scopes is rather unnecesary, itll take more time, resources and money to get what you want, rather than focusing those 3 to try and fix some things with the game, mainly the servers, on top that seeing is more important than looking through your 1k USD aim pro red dot on your TMP, seeing is by far more important than looking through your sights for immersion or "better aim", and just like Jackal mentioned earlier, the spread on the guns is way too big, even when you ADS, very few weapons do shoot where you aim and those being the semi auto rifles and the M82, everything else is spread as much as possible even when ADSing, and you wont want to be hindered when going against a swarm by how slow you become just from raising your gun to be more accurate

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by (N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★:

Thats not really good logic.
Development time wasted on a feature that doesnt improve the game.... development on more content that expands game?

That assumes ADS/Scopes will not improve the game and lead to wasted programming time. Many disagree with that. My point is the same.

And you are assuming that it will?
Your point is not the same lol.
You are harping on me for wanting actual developer focus on expanding the game with more maps and such while you are wanting them to focus on something that literally won't add any more depth to the game.

What do you personally benefit from being able to ADS?
How does that change your experience?

And get ready for my follow up question.
How does having that prolong gameplay replayability over additional content like maps?

Also, if they do ADS we are going to have none stop complaining about weapon spread next and the people who demanded ADS wont even be playing the game anymore anyways. Tell you what, I'll swap the logic since you think this is okay.
I want the option for over the shoulder 3rd person view in B4B. By your logic developers should focus on that because tons of THE MOST played games are in 3rd person. Fornite more than quadruples the most played first person shooter game on the market so yeah.... does it make sense to really do that in B4B? No. The game isnt meant for it.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by (N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★:

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

That assumes ADS/Scopes will not improve the game and lead to wasted programming time. Many disagree with that. My point is the same.

And you are assuming that it will?
Your point is not the same lol.
You are harping on me for wanting actual developer focus on expanding the game with more maps and such while you are wanting them to focus on something that literally won't add any more depth to the game.

What do you personally benefit from being able to ADS?
How does that change your experience?

And get ready for my follow up question.
How does having that prolong gameplay replayability over additional content like maps?

Also, if they do ADS we are going to have none stop complaining about weapon spread next and the people who demanded ADS wont even be playing the game anymore anyways. Tell you what, I'll swap the logic since you think this is okay.
I want the option for over the shoulder 3rd person view in B4B. By your logic developers should focus on that because tons of THE MOST played games are in 3rd person. Fornite more than quadruples the most played first person shooter game on the market so yeah.... does it make sense to really do that in B4B? No. The game isnt meant for it.

We both assume don't we?
I mostly care for scopes not so much ADS.

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by (N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★:

And you are assuming that it will?
Your point is not the same lol.
You are harping on me for wanting actual developer focus on expanding the game with more maps and such while you are wanting them to focus on something that literally won't add any more depth to the game.

What do you personally benefit from being able to ADS?
How does that change your experience?

And get ready for my follow up question.
How does having that prolong gameplay replayability over additional content like maps?

Also, if they do ADS we are going to have none stop complaining about weapon spread next and the people who demanded ADS wont even be playing the game anymore anyways. Tell you what, I'll swap the logic since you think this is okay.
I want the option for over the shoulder 3rd person view in B4B. By your logic developers should focus on that because tons of THE MOST played games are in 3rd person. Fornite more than quadruples the most played first person shooter game on the market so yeah.... does it make sense to really do that in B4B? No. The game isnt meant for it.

We both assume don't we?
I mostly care for scopes not so much ADS.

Well, I can factually tell you that adding ADS would eat up development time and would be less impactful to gameplay longevity over adding more maps, weapons, classes.

And again... you would be up in arms if people were demanding 3rd person in B4B.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by (N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★:

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

We both assume don't we?
I mostly care for scopes not so much ADS.

Well, I can factually tell you that adding ADS would eat up development time and would be less impactful to gameplay longevity over adding more maps, weapons, classes.

And again... you would be up in arms if people were demanding 3rd person in B4B.

Anything changed in the game would add development time. Some more than others. Are you a 3rd person, person?