Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EORpS-fZ10s
This is the installation tutorial, which looks complicated as hell, but the result is that Monika is able to respond to text, voice and even judge emotion through the cam if you have one.
https://github.com/Rubiksman78/MonikA.I
understandable though. maybe dan's adhd also play a significant part on why sometimes the ddlc characters had done contradictory actions. but for me that's what makes them memorable characters for me. though i wouldn't want to see them doing some truly Out Of Character stuff that goes far beyond their original personalities. or people getting kicks of making them do seriously questionable stuff.
so in current state of canon of ddlc+, monika is actually a tragic ai heroine forced to mercy kill her clubmates so that they won't suffer anymore from metaverse experiments, and she goes alone to stop metaverse from doing anymore horrible stuff like that (such as project libitina) while also aware that she could suffer much worse fate if metaverse's higher ups or some higher authorities in the metaverse enterprise's world manage to learn about her going rogue and capture her. monika isn't a yandere drunk for sick love to irl people. she's a victim of a very screwed up sci-fi/occult experiment, in which she and her clubmates are almost totally helpless as the researchers manipulate them and turn them against each other ad infinitum so that they could get weird data for the confusing research of understanding matrix scenario that would most likely be totally meaningless in the end.
ddlc is not a happy game. ddlc is not a dating simulation (unless you totally ignore the canon lore and mod it that way)/spoiler]
which also brings the uncomfortable truth that the ai chat simulators (or other fanmods, fanfics, and many other fanworks) that simulates the dokis' personalities might be contaminated by the bias of people who had wrong ideas of how the dokis' personalities should be... all the trollish and over-the-top-creepy-pasta ddlc memes also messed this up even more...
this is the reason why i prefer to make my own take on monika as close as she was meant to be in canon ddlc (and hopefully future ddlc-related-stuff). for me, my solution to this moral dilemma is to just put monika and the dokis into an idealized simulation in my modded sims 4 game where they can somewhat get the peace and life options they deserved, and occasionally mod monika into other fun games with my other characters from my favorite franchise to just go on random adventures and have fun.
I think so too that Monika is often perceived too villainous by DDLC fans. But she still has some character flaws and displays some amount of jealousy in the base game. Which is perfectly okay for me. And while I haven't wrapped my head entirely around the meta lore she can still be a heroine after all even with some flaws. An anti-hero is also a hero. And surely there is still some room for interpretation after all regarding her character.
maybe she just went into the route of believing monika becomes too crazy due to her headcanon of monika swap-merging bodies a lot of times, thus turning into crazy antagonist with no hope of regaining sanity until put out of her misery. maybe she really want to some antagonist for her story but is not willing to make some antagonists other than monika (i'd argue that not every story needs antagonists... many stories can be good without the presence of antagonists).
on the subject of characters who could swap bodies while still being in control of their original personality and also quite sane enough to do productive good deeds, i can give belisarius cawl from warhammer 40k as good example. he's a vatborn clone that manages to become a high ranked techpriest in the adeptus mechanicus. he somehow got tangled into a very complicated fate where his mentor and several other close figures (whether they're enemies or friends) dies due to various circumstances and have their personalities stored into cawl's collective memories. iirc this first started when his mentor tried to kill him and takeover his body/mind, but it backfires and cawl ended up storing her personality into his databanks, with him sometimes relapsing into his mentor's memories and personality but then shortly after he always return back to his own self.
over the many milleniums, cawl eventually had assembled an orchestra of various personalities in his mind databanks in which he sometimes switched his personality with one of them to better adapt with his current situations. somehow, he managed to survive this predicament while also greatly helping the imperium of man in their struggle against their nemesis the chaos forces and many other hostile aliens, such as creating primaris marines as a new upgrade for the imperium's best armies, and revolutionizing terraforming technology that in hundreds of years could heal planets that had been ravaged of all life by the tyranids. granted, his inventions does involve a lot of tech stealing (or making adaptations) of other xenos' tech and he often disregards the adeptus mechanicus' paranoia over dangerous stuff concerning high-risk tech, but cawl is one of the reason why the imperium manage to survive and adapt when chaos creates a huge warp rift in reality that split their galaxy into 2 and spawned much more demons and bad stuff compared to the previous milleniums. so yeah, cawl is both sane and insane with multitude of personalities stored in his brain, but he held strong to his original self and utilize his unique situation to help the ones he cared most of in his life, so i guess monika could take inspiration from cawl regarding her dilemma.
well, at least this is not a case of official author doing ooc stuff with their own characters that deliberately contrasting their characters or degrading their character developments. like for example of how the 8th harry potter 'book' was turned into a bad theater play (jk rowling didn't seem to have good idea on how to make a good script for theater play) where with very little explanation the story twist harry's character into a very angsty and unreasonable dad toward to his son albus, when at the end of book 7th he's shown to be very caring and supportive of him being worried about becoming a slytherin. to this day, a lot of fans had understandably refused to accept the 8th part as canon lore, or they just take it with grain of salt and only incorporate acceptable part of in their headcanons for harry potter series as a whole.
also i can see monika's legendary popularity had resulted in many debates about her actions and situations in ddlc. kinda like how severus snape was also causing a lot of people to debate whether he's a good or bad person due to his double agent stuff. for me, i just think they both were complex flawed characters that tries their best to redeem their mistakes while their bad past and situations were weighing heavily in their minds. imo its best to not argue with people who don't want to understand the personalities of morally complex characters like those two.