How would you compare DBFZ gameplay to Street Fighter?

[King Hadu]

So Street Fighter is known as the best and most technical fighting game series ever made. And continues to reign as the number 1 watched EVO fighting game tournament for pretty good reasons.

In comparison how would you compare DBFZ? is it a very much dumbed down game or is it as technical as SF?

And how would DBFZ rank when compared to say MKX or Injustice 2 for gameplay?

OR BETTER YET HOW DOES DBFZ compare to Guilty Gear?

[King Hadu]

引用自 Sid2Vicious：

If Guilty Gear Rev 2 and UMvC3 had a baby, Dragon Ball FighterZ would be it.

yeah but isn't guilty Gear one of the most technical fighters ever made?

[King Hadu]

引用自 Punymeyer：

引用自 King Hadu：

So Street Fighter is known as the best and most technical fighting game series ever made

wut

I think you should check out KOF and Guilty Gear if you really think that.

I suppose a more accurate statement would have been SF3 3rd Strike is the most technical and difficult fighting game?

[DBZ_KAKAROT]

引用自 King Hadu：

引用自 Sid2Vicious：

If Guilty Gear Rev 2 and UMvC3 had a baby, Dragon Ball FighterZ would be it.

yeah but isn't guilty Gear one of the most technical fighters ever made?

It's not all that hard, not much different than SF games. But that's why UMvC3 is in the mix, which is basically QCF every attack like FighterZ

[Jeranhound]

引用自 King Hadu：

引用自 Punymeyer：

wut

I think you should check out KOF and Guilty Gear if you really think that.

I suppose a more accurate statement would have been SF3 3rd Strike is the most technical and difficult fighting game?

Still gotta go with KoF or some other anime fighter, if only because of the extremely tight execution. 3rd Strike may be stricter than SFV, but at least it doesn't have pretzel motions that need to be done absolutely perfectly.

[King Hadu]

When I see this Video I am usually reminded that SF3 has no equal when it comes to fighting games. Rodriguez makes it look easy but it isn't

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CGeZvcphDY

[76561198034985543]

引用自 King Hadu：

When I see this Video I am usually reminded that SF3 has no equal when it comes to fighting games. Rodriguez makes it look easy but it isn't

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CGeZvcphDY

Does anybody else find it hilarious that 3rd Strike Online Edition from 2011 has GGPO netcode, yet for some idiotic reason Capcom suddenly had a change of heart and felt the need to include the most rubbish roll back netcode in SFV?

[Jeranhound]

Still better than SFxT. The game was all but dead by the time I got it, but the few matches I could get were almost universally terrible. A shame it died off like it did. Its 1 year update fixed most of its issues, with just the clock running too fast being left, and its 2 Evo appearances are a great show.

[King Hadu]

Someone told me guilty gear is one of the most technical games out there and dbfz is like gg?

[Sp00kyFox]

I wouldn't. it's basically Guilty Gear Xrd game mechanics combined with the general idea of Marvel vs Capcom, to put it simple.

[mitspieler]

From first impression, its a 4-button game (+2 assist buttons to make it 6) and most specials are done with the usual quartercircle/fireball/236 motion. Imo it feels like Xrd without the medium attack. So while this is not heavy on execution, the different systems can be combined ina nice way.
Imo they quite nailed the "easy to learn, hard to master" this time.

[⎛Double Double⎞]

引用自 jordangsu：

It's a much more simple version mvc3. SF isn't the most technical, it's just popular, I'd argue that many of the anime fighters are far more complicated.

You don't even own the game. So shhh

[Codester]

SF is the fighting game to which all other fighting games is compared to. To see say it's just popular...is an ignorant and silly understatement. It's popular because it has the best mechanics competitively for a 1 vs 1 fighting game. No other series comes close to the same Lv of quality. Weather or not people in this thread agree is irrelevant, it's survived this long and show cases in pretty much every single major tournament including EVO. Has nothing to do with it being "popular" it's king based on its own merit. Dbz is a very fun game. But it's very casual. It's going to be popular for a long while too until SA makes a sequel I bet. But it's pretty hard to compare the two, they are incredibly different with many major mechanical differences.

[JBM]

引用自 King Hadu：

So Street Fighter is known as the best and most technical fighting game series ever made. And continues to reign as the number 1 watched EVO fighting game tournament for pretty good reasons.

In comparison how would you compare DBFZ? is it a very much dumbed down game or is it as technical as SF?

And how would DBFZ rank when compared to say MKX or Injustice 2 for gameplay?

OR BETTER YET HOW DOES DBFZ compare to Guilty Gear?

Guilty gear. It's an arcsys game. Combo system is the same, so is other anime-ish stuff. It's easier than GG, but it's along the same lines. It's also very similar to mvci, in some aspects more similar than even to other arcsys games.

It has nothing to do with sf, as the whole mechanical approach is completely different (links vs chains, aerial movement, blocking, button layout etc).

In one sentence, let's say it's a GG/MvCI mashup which is easier to get into than those two. And I'd say it's pretty good.

[King Hadu]

引用自 Codester：

SF is the fighting game to which all other fighting games is compared to. To see say it's just popular...is an ignorant and silly understatement. It's popular because it has the best mechanics competitively for a 1 vs 1 fighting game. No other series comes close to the same Lv of quality. Weather or not people in this thread agree is irrelevant, it's survived this long and show cases in pretty much every single major tournament including EVO. Has nothing to do with it being "popular" it's king based on its own merit. Dbz is a very fun game. But it's very casual. It's going to be popular for a long while too until SA makes a sequel I bet. But it's pretty hard to compare the two, they are incredibly different with many major mechanical differences.

best post on this thread

[Shogun]

Simple,SF you have to first master controls then you have to master a character, then psycho-social element of the game during a match (the mind games, reading opponents and things of that nature).

With this game you can master controls pretty quickly (though there is a pretty surprising heavy naunce to them), also characters aren't too tough to master (though it's a 3v3 fighter, so learning three will help if you're planning on climbing ranks to the highest tier obviously), but you go straight into the mind games and reading opponents for the most part.

The last decent SF game was 3rd Strike (and I suppose Ultra SF 4 now that it's a complete package), SFV is an utter mess, looks and plays like a snoozefest. Lots of people discount the aesthetics of a game by saying "graphics don't matter" aesthetic exectution and graphics are not the same thing, when you have a game that looks as good at is plays, it multiplies on top of one another. And that is somewhat what you have with this game. SF seems to have lost some of that on it's way to 3D.

But then again "muh nostalgia" is heavy with StreetFighter, and not really with this game (though GuiltyGear is, and Dragonball as universe is as well) but nowhere near the level of SF in terms of fighting games.