Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
not that hard, first idea i had (I am deaf) is "entangled" whiteboards.. a shared text chat that only one can type on at a time
Sure, the game *could* have been designed around that idea instead, not having timed puzzles (or having timed puzzles designed around the balance between looking at the tablet and looking at the world around the character) but that would be a pretty different game, and not one that feels the same for the people who aren't deaf.
So while it is unfortunate that deaf people wouldn't be able to easily enjoy this kind of game, it's also not up to the developers to make sure the game is accessible to every single person - plenty of people simply don't enjoy this kind of game to begin with, and those people aren't people the developers are making the game for, anyway. This is a little different from something like designing with colourblindness in mind, since that's usually a very easy fix (just ensuring the colours chosen work even for colourblind people, especially if you just use things like different textures or symbols rather than colours without changing any other core gameplay component as a result). Asking a developer to keep colourblind folks in mind is perfectly acceptable, but asking a game like this - a game based around the idea of asymmetrical puzzle solving via one-way voice communication via Walkie Talkie - to accomodate people that can't hear would be like asking for video games to be designed for blind people.
Sorry for the rant :) Just because "it's not that hard" to come up with an idea for an entirely different game that works for deaf people doesn't mean it isn't very hard to make this game's core gameplay deaf-friendly.
A whiteboard would take much of the fun out of it, because a great deal of the game involves describing symbols. Simply drawing them circumvents it.
Not all PCs are equal.
Such as life, there's pros and cons in everything and the sad part is, we can't always have everything in life. :(
The visuals of this game is amazing, too bad there's a drawback for deaf players. It gets frustrating sometimes. Thankfully, there's still plenty of game choices out there to choose from. Just wish this game was one of them. *Shrugs* Oh well.
I'm a software engineer with degrees in game dev/design so I am very aware of "its not that hard" comments when I'm talking about an engineering problem.
The problem with your statement here is that you're assuming that communication MUST be verbal, which is never true ESPECIALLY for games. I consider this issue up there with ease of implementation alongside with colorblindness (e.g. add text chat is as easy as adding symbols or color mapping for colorblindness).
If you want to use timing challenges as a counterpoint to justify not adding support for some other visual medium then you really should read up on some of the Deaf Destiny Raid completion stories, they've managed to do what amounts to a one way communication in a variety of time sensitive challenges and win. Just because you can't think of a way to make it work doesn't mean there isn't a way. If the developer wants to constrain communication access to "one way" then there's ways to make the game still accessibile with timing challenges and make it non-verbal.
There's a vareity of talks and presentations out there (I myself gave one) on how to approach this type of problem and how to solve it.