Battlebit is just a poorly made MAG clone

[BiscuitTheCat]

I think the devs really need to give credit to Zipper for making MAG on the PS3. Without it this game wouldn't exist.

MAG was an absolute amazing game and the Battlebit devs just copy pasted all their ideas but somehow made them worse. The Battlebit devs should be ashamed of so blatantly copying like this.

To the devs I say you'll never make a game that is anywhere near as good as MAG and you should just stop now before you end up getting a cease and desist from Sony. I get it, you want to make a good game, but you'll never live up to the amazing game that is MAG!

[datCookie]

As people have done in other threads, instead of giving the clown awards to the OP (who clearly deserves them), give them to me instead. They'll be put to better use!

[Rescultir]

It's not MAG it's battlefield bad company but bad company still better.

[BiscuitTheCat]

Originally posted by 🩸Rescultir:

It's not MAG it's battlefield bad company but bad company still better.

Highly disagree here. Battlebit does not share anything with any Battlfield game. Completely different genres.

It's a MAG clone and a bad one at that.

[BiscuitTheCat]

Originally posted by Tenko:

...You do know that MAG sucked and died within a year right?.... It was also the downfall of the company whos devs never recovered and came back in the industry.....and of course its different than battlefield because it was designed with ideas from other games...you're litterally comparing a 2023 Dodge Charger to a Model T Ford

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by BiscuitTheCat:

I think the devs really need to give credit to Zipper for making MAG on the PS3. Without it this game wouldn't exist.

MAG was an absolute amazing game and the Battlebit devs just copy pasted all their ideas but somehow made them worse. The Battlebit devs should be ashamed of so blatantly copying like this.

To the devs I say you'll never make a game that is anywhere near as good as MAG and you should just stop now before you end up getting a cease and desist from Sony. I get it, you want to make a good game, but you'll never live up to the amazing game that is MAG!

What? The only thing the two shared in common was that it had large scale battles, but then you didnt play battlefield and original cods.

[johnebs]

M.A.G. Was a great concept but was way ahead of it time. Gameplay wise, it was great, the structure was great and the map (1 map if I remember that correctly) was great.

M.A.G. died due to an awful progression system and horrendous match making system. This was completal redone (M.A.G. 2.0) and was great. Sadly, by the time the patch came out it was already too late.