Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Being gay isn't my personality, I just like the sound of "you've been killed by the gays"
It's giving me Alex Jones vibes. Yall remember his ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ "you're turning the freakin frogs gay" quote? I personally found that ♥♥♥♥ hilarious because he's achieved a level of stupidity that it's incredibly impressive.
With that being said, SOCIETY relegates us as "the gays" with that whole "the gay agenda" ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. We see it on the news every june because pride month brings out the crazies. What's wrong with leaning into it? I mean if people expect it, then nothing should be wrong with me embracing it as satire.
I'm replying anyways. Ok so when people speak about animals being altered by hormone levels changing in the water, what they're talking about is growth hormones and preservatives and things that we as human beings create and add to food, NOT some super secret gay conversion hormone that's specifically engineered to create homosexuality.
That research you're talking about specifically talks about Steroid hormones, such as oestrogens and testosterone, can end up in the surface water via wastewater. Water companies treat this water, after which it will flow out of your tap.
Oestrogens and testosterone don't make animals or humans gay.
I'm not ignorant, YOU fail to understand what you've read online and simply took that information at face value instead of actually trying to comprehend what you were reading.
Thanks for trying though.
I'm not wrong this is quite literally what this research shows. Want to prove me wrong? Then supply actual research stating otherwise.
"The data doesn't lie, but the people who write the stories do" - Can be said about literally anything that you personally disagree with. You can choose to believe that the earth is flat, but we have evidence to show that it isn't, and the people who tell us about that evidence are people who are called "scientists". A scientist since you seem to not know, is a person who tests out theories (like your THEORY that a chemical exists to alter someone or somethings sexuality) and proves whether or not that thing is true, and then records the outcome. Anyone who LIES about their results is immediately exposed by other scientists because of a tiny little process we like to call "peer review". This means that the scientist will provide their findings as well as the process they used to come to their conclusions to a group of other scientists, and they'll replicate that experiment to try and recreate the outcome that the original scientist claimed they had obtained. If they are able to re-create that outcome, then the experiment has passed peer review and is recorded as fact, but if it DOESN'T pass peer review, then that scientist gets their funding cut (meaning they basically become unemployed).
You are simply telling me to do my own research because you have no actual proof or any actual links you are capable of providing to fight for your point, which I'm assuming is a chemical compound existing that is capable of changing sexual orientation. You have what is called "the burden of proof" which means you must supply a peer reviewed scientific study on frogs sexuality being changed due to the introduction of a newly discovered hormone being added to water.
If you refuse to provide any supportive articles or studies that show the existence of a hormone that is being added into the water OTHER THAN Oestrogens and testosterone, that is PROVEN to have an effect on the sexuality of frogs, then you do not have a valid argument.
*basically what I've said here is that it's impossible for the research I've done to be falsified due to the existence of peer review, because unlike you and the people you listen to and learn from, scientists call each other on their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and test ♥♥♥♥ out for themselves to come to their own conclusions, instead of simply accepting notions like "believe me, everyone else is a liar", because statistically speaking people who want others to only take them at their word and to operate on faith rather than hard facts, are the real LIARS*.
But you keep operating thinking that everything you read online is "fake news". You can keep living in your make believe world where the world is flat and there's a miracle hormone to make others gay. I wont shame you for it, even if we all know it's total ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Either provide proof YOURSELF or get lost.