Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you can't understand the very basic rules that they lay out, why do you think you should still have access to their service at all? A person willfully breaking an EULA is grounds to completely remove you from a service. Be happy it is only a temp ban.
Swing and a miss.
This completely misses my point. My point is that in-game text chat and voice chat ♥♥♥♥ should have communication bans, not gameplay bans. I still think my ban is dumb, but at this point ive come to accept that, and I feel if im gonna ♥♥♥♥♥, might as well be useful. And communication bans just make much more sense to me.
Why should I be gameplay banned for words when the offense has nothing to do with ruining the player experience via in-game cheating/exploits or any gamplay actions (not including communication)? When you ban someone, its based on what they do, you wouldnt exactly ban someone from a bathroom because they said slurs in a classroom yeah? You would ban them from the school because thats appropriate and relevant to the offense committed.
So why is that same logic not applied here? Because 'yer a racist, therefore you dont deserve anything!'? Moderation should never be dictated by feelings, thats how we get Reddit Mods. And by that virtue, bans for in-game ♥♥♥♥ shouldnt be dictated by how offended someone is. Bans should be dictated by actions. Communication Bans should be reserved for communication offenses, gameplay bans should be reserved for gameplay offenses. They should not be under the same umbrella.
They need to set a clear basis on what they dont allow, ♥♥♥♥♥ vague as to what is and isnt a llowed. What constitues as racism? Dropping the n bomb regardless of context? Thats such a shoe fits all system, which doesnt make sense. Oughta make a list for this.
Orrrrr.... we could have minimal moderation, let the boys be boys and only step in once things get majorly outta hand. I just really do not like this system, period. I really hope no mfs fall into the same trap I have.
And I forgot to mention, but the ban in question was for saying the n word. Thats it. Never said it in a racist or derogatory context, just simply said the n word by itself, and then next day, banned. I appeal and I get:"Stays as is, no further discussion". Unbelievable.
Imma sign off here then. I am so tired.
My question is.. in this day and age when EVERYTHING is recorded, everything is logged.. why would you want to even to play with the fire that burns?