Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Because if it's out of 500 you're near the bottom. ha. And if it's like 2500, or something it's better.
You get more points for a win still right? So it's divided over amount of games played I think.
it just tells you your place when you got to that medal regardless of time played or matches won.
At the time when you got the medal you were player 468/468.
Well what I'm on about, is that its not really a rank based on merit but time, unless it's the merit of dedication, and it didn't start that way... In before I know mmr is the real skill.
MMR doesn't show time played or amount of matches so I think there's still call for a rank. Though it might be a bit misnamed now.
It still could show a comparison. It would be interesting to know different measurements.
A won game still gives more points doesn't it? So if it were filtered on time, or amount of games won, it would show some one who played better and won more matches in a shorter time, vs someone who played a lot more matches. That kind of thing.
So like your mmr/time played or mmr/games played, + grandmaster nr, smt like that.
The data you provide now will be slightly corrupted if you have played games after recieving the medal.