An open letter to Naumy

[SteveHNo96]

and there it is again. your attempt to use your hatred and spoonfed talking points to justify your hatred.

Statistics are not talking points, but you're too stupid to know the difference.

your transphobic rhetoric doesnt belong here anymore than your attempts to paint yourself (and straight people en large) as victims. which, ill say it again: you dont speak for straight people as a group.

When 98.5% of a group do not want to date something and even with this so-called "rise" in the view of trans porn, 95.1% of people who view porn do not want it, it's time for the overwhelming majority to stand up and tell your stupid ass to sit down and ♥♥♥♥ off.

You don't belong on this planet. I've said it before and I'll say it again. The left use "muh ekwality" as a shield to be bullies, which is what you are. A bully and a piece of sh!t. Actually, piece of sh!t is too nice. You're a pile of bat barf, because sh*t can be used to make fertilizer.

only the ones show share your bigotry* which, again, belongs in spaces like twitter. where "cis" is hatespeech, but slurs against gay or trans people isnt.

As the owner of Twitter said “At its heart, wokeness is divisive, exclusionary, and hateful. It basically gives mean people a shield to be mean and cruel, armored in false virtue.”

You don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about gay or trans people, you just want to silence opposing opinions. By the way, the reason Elon Musk BOUGHT Twitter was to restore free speech which your Facebook, Amazon, Google buddies were silencing, and we all know what that makes you, the first letter of every one of those companies put together.

as i just said, your hatred doesnt belong here. and its weird that you think anyone takes your concern trolling as valid criticsms.

No such thing. I'm your worst nightmare. I believe in REAL equality, that means no gay pride parades without straight pride parades. No BET without a Caucasian entertainment, etc. See, you never wanted equality, you wanted super-equality, that is BIPOC can have their own things and invade other peoples' spaces. It's like a reverse Jim Crow. Either it's okay for everyone or it's okay for no one is my take.

and theres that concern trolling again. It seems you lack the ability to care about multiple issues at once. I, for one, am not as limited as you clearly show yourself to be.

No, I'm saying the truth. I believe you and all the other F.A.G.'s (Facebook, Amazon, Google sheep) should move to Saudi Arabia and demand the right for gay men to march at Pride during Ramadan. What is it you losers used to say "An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere"? Well, you certainly don't act it. In fact, I said it before and I'll say it again. You don't care about gay people, you just want to bully and name-call anyone who disagrees with you. That's what you are, a bully. Nothing more now get the ♥♥♥♥ out of here.

under 60* its not my fault you grossly over-estimate you and your ilks IQs. and also, that you dont understand what IQ even measures.

It actually measures how good you are at IQ tests. It was created in 1904 by Alfred Binet to measure how good French kids were at understanding French culture. It wasn't until H.H. Goddard in 1913 decided to try to apply it to the general public that we use it as we do today.

But you whose IQ is below the white pus that comes out of a blister when it's been sitting for a year and is basically a robber baron scumbag devoid of any admirable human qualities (as are all who are woke) wouldn't know that.

irrelevant hand-waving. you would loathe living in that overbearing and anti-freedom society. so dont pretend you can parade hate-fueled religious societies as any sort of beacon of value when we talk about freedoms of society.

in a way, your ideal society is heading there. You want to silence all dissenting opinions to the F.A.G.'s of the world and turn everyone into a brain-dead sheep spewing whatever rhetoric the media gives you. The worst kind of lack of diversity is not diverse races but the inability to stand up and freely think.

religious fueled bigotry.

also because American companies looking for that sweet DEI money using a metric by a pedophile organization, the Human Rights Campaign, who wanted to teach five year olds about gay sex, measures. We are a society that has gone the wrong way and the companies know that but if they want a line of credit, they listen to their DEI overlords like Oliver Twist asking for more.

if you wonder such about such a blatantly spoon-fed talking point, you make it clear your IQ is as low as you accuse others IQs of being.

There's that F.A.G. talk again. Do you have anything original to say? Let me guess. No.

no you dont. you want to parrot bigoted talking points while concern trolling.

ok groomer. Keep following the people who make pedophiles rich.

but you wouldn't want to hear it because you haven't been taught right.

correctly* and you clearly dont know why. "youve been taught incorrectly."

Both are acceptable uses of the term. Now you're just being an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

and theres that victim act. one fueled by what youve wanted me to post, not what ive actually posted.

No, white liberals are really joyless, obnoxious, insufferable, psychotic trolls that are nothing but low-down, double-dealing, backstabbing, larcenous perverted worms, and that's their strong points. I'm simply giving these people a taste of their own medicine.

so you admit your concern trolling out of a twisted desire for some form of revenge. fueled by spoon-fed, anti-LGBTQ bigotry.

Only as far as your ♥♥♥♥♥♥ side would admit ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on heterosexual-themed games for the last decade. You're so blind in being an idiot you wouldn't know your own ass unless your college professor told you where it was.

I still dont need to move to care about multiple issues at once. and youre still attempting (very poorly, which still shows an inadequate IQ level) to paint yourself as a victim.

*shovels ♥♥♥♥* Do you work for Imax, dude? Because that's some hardcore projection you're doing.

ive done nothing of the sort.

Wrong. In fact, you should walk around with a tattoo on your head that says "F.A.G." because that's who you obey, multinational rich corporations that don't give a ♥♥♥♥ if you live or die.

your attempts to poison the well have failed miserably. and youve made it clear that, when your attempts to concern troll fail, you have no idea where to go. so you pretend to be a victim.

No, you really are a bully and what happens when God creates a turd that wouldn't flush. I knew from the beginning you didn't care, you just pretend to so you can bully and abuse anyone who disagrees with you.

I'll be waiting for you to move. Until then, ♥♥♥♥ off.

[Naumy]

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

There's that F.A.G. talk again. Do you have anything original to say? Let me guess. No.

oh honey, youre so mad your homophobia is showing again.

it also quite pathetic to create another thread to whine at me in (while throwing around your gross homophobia and transphobia) after your initial thread got locked, and you got banned. repeatedly.

[Naumy]

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

No, you really are a bully

oh honey.....you got banned for over a month, and your thread got locked, because you were spewing rightwing, homophobic, and transphobic talking points. NOW you want to complain about being bullied. and you expect ANYONE to take you seriously? no. your "get taken seriously" ship sailed the moment you decided to complain about a game you havent played, dont own, and never will play. instead, you just want to complain about gay people and trans people existing. which is just weird of you.

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

and what happens when God creates a turd that wouldn't flush.....

prove your magical sky daddy exists, kid.

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

I knew from the beginning you didn't care, you just pretend to so you can bully and abuse anyone who disagrees with you.....

so if i dont care about homophobes, i dont care about anything? oh honey....you arent that important.

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

I'll be waiting for you to move. Until then, ♥♥♥♥ off.

youre babbling incoherently, kid. calm down, then try again. this time, dont be so upset, and dont pew attack that can easily be reported, especially when those same attacks have gotten you banned in the past when you tried to bully other people.

[Naumy]

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

*laughs* nice projection, homeboy. Do you work for IMAX? Get back in your tree, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. You like to throw dime-a-dozen insults that mean nothing anymore.

thank you for not denying for blatant homophobia and transphobia. theres no need to read your bloviating any further, kid. run along now, and wait for the next ban youll receive....again.

[Naumy]

and yet again, you get banned for attacking people. its really too bad youve not matured at all over the past 7 years.

and youre still homophobic and transphobic. no matter how much you abhor that being pointed out. do better, for once.

[Naumy]

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

Originally posted by Naumy:

and yet again, you get banned for attacking people. its really too bad youve not matured at all over the past 7 years.

No, I just told the truth. The fact Steam doesn't like it doesn't make it any less true.

then why havent you told the truth, kid? why are you still an unbridled bigot? so much so you literally keep getting banned from the forum of a game youve never played.

rather sad.

[Naumy]

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

Get the ♥♥♥♥ back in your tree, F.A.G. follower. Like I said earlier, you should have a tattoo on your head that says "F.A.G." because that's what you are, a follower of all the F.A.G.s that squash dissenting speech and ♥♥♥♥ on anyone who thinks for themselves.

the moment you crawl back under your rock, and get a tattoo proclaiming how much a homophobic bigot you are across your forehead. after all, its undeniably what you are. a homophobic bigot. and you keep proving how bigoted you are time and time again.

your life must be undeniably sad, you weird bigot.

[captainmundy]

what does this have to do with dating dads lol

[Naumy]

Nothing. He's a bigot who has spent the last 7 years getting banned, waiting it out, then reposting hate-fueled, anti-LGBTQ+, political rhetoric.

He has never played the game, will never play the game, and will never purchase it.

He's a hater who comes her specifically to spew hatred, and should have been permanently banned years ago. It's mind-blowing that this topic hasn't been locked like his other.

He's weird, but the moderation here is incredibly lacking.

[SteveHNo96]

Originally posted by Naumy:

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

No, I just told the truth. The fact Steam doesn't like it doesn't make it any less true.

then why havent you told the truth, kid? why are you still an unbridled bigot? so much so you literally keep getting banned from the forum of a game youve never played.

rather sad.

The same reason why you're still a F.A.G. who slurps your Facebook, Amazon and Google overlords' male genitals on a regular basis, because it's what you do.

Oh and you've been a stupid piece of ♥♥♥♥ your entire life, so I know you won't stop now.

[SteveHNo96]

Originally posted by Naumy:

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

Get the ♥♥♥♥ back in your tree, F.A.G. follower. Like I said earlier, you should have a tattoo on your head that says "F.A.G." because that's what you are, a follower of all the F.A.G.s that squash dissenting speech and ♥♥♥♥ on anyone who thinks for themselves.

the moment you crawl back under your rock, and get a tattoo proclaiming how much a homophobic bigot you are across your forehead. after all, its undeniably what you are. a homophobic bigot. and you keep proving how bigoted you are time and time again.

your life must be undeniably sad, you weird bigot.

Here's the difference. I'm calling you out because you don't answer a simple ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ question. You call me a bigot because your T-count, IQ and jean size are exactly the same and answering the question would expose your own hypocrisy, you giant ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ imbecile. Get back in your tree and walk around with F.A.G. on your head permanently because that's who owns you.

Go spread AIDS like the other F.A.G.S. or monkeypox and have a tattoo of F.A.G. on your forehead in bright red ink, because that's what you are.

[SteveHNo96]

Originally posted by Naumy:

Nothing. He's a bigot who has spent the last 7 years getting banned, waiting it out, then reposting hate-fueled, anti-LGBTQ+, political rhetoric.

He has never played the game, will never play the game, and will never purchase it.

He's a hater who comes her specifically to spew hatred, and should have been permanently banned years ago. It's mind-blowing that this topic hasn't been locked like his other.

He's weird, but the moderation here is incredibly lacking.

No, you're just a piece of ♥♥♥♥ who relies on the media to tell you what to think about everything. If you had to come up with even one original thought on your own, the universe would come to a sudden and abrupt end because it's never happened in your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ lifetime.

I'll ask the question one more time hoping your retarded ass will answer, although I don't hold out much if any hope.

Why is it that you're okay ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on heterosexual-themed games but consider gay-based games as sacred cows? If it's not the reason I stated, and that's because you're a hypocritical ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who was raised by commie college professors who were also raised to hate America, heterosexuality, masculinity and basically everything that made the country successful, then what is it?

You don't have to take my word for it, instead pay heed to two studies that completely derailed the concept of peer review and academic integrity: Sokal Squared in 2018 and Sokal the Third in 2021, both of which gave extremely faulty data but because it was anti-white, anti-heterosexual, anti-male and in the case of Sokal the third, anti-conservative, they published it even with the REALLY faulty data. But you'll just gaslight all of us, because reading is too hard for you. You just sit in front of the TV or the computer screen and let all the F.A.G.'s tell you what to think in 5 minutes.

As usual, you're just a brain-dead piece of ♥♥♥♥ who relies on F.A.G. (and we can add Steam so your ilk are now calling it "bigotry" because you can't handle the truth: that you're a brain-dead sheep braying whatever the media tells you to think, even though it's a blatant double standard.

Seriously, if you were to die tomorrow, 1000 other zero-brained ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ would take your place saying the same thing. That's what you are. as useless as a bikini at a nudist beach and as worthless as one grain of sand on a beach full of morons. I'm not a bigot, you're just a piece of ♥♥♥♥ who can't handle his own hypocrisy.

[𝑅ottenfruit11]

I bought the game, played the game, enjoyed it a lot, and think both of these people are absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. How two people can have such conflicting but equally dumb opinions is so magical I am convinced this has to be the same person LARPing an argument online. Both arguments are just two sides of the same coin. If you are actually two people (big if) then you should just kiss (let me watch) and make up already.

[SteveHNo96]

Originally posted by 𝑅ottenfruit11:

I bought the game, played the game, enjoyed it a lot, and think both of these people are absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. How two people can have such conflicting but equally dumb opinions is so magical I am convinced this has to be the same person LARPing an argument online. Both arguments are just two sides of the same coin. If you are actually two people (big if) then you should just kiss (let me watch) and make up already.

Nah, I have a thing called standards which most people who play gay-themed games (or date trans women) don't have. I know this is too complicated for you, and that's understandable but the left have been taking away standards from str8 men for thirty years, starting when they called men who liked women as "SECKSIST" and well, ending with trans women.

[𝑅ottenfruit11]

The argument presented contains several logical flaws and issues in reasoning, as well as assumptions that reflect a potentially biased or emotionally charged mental state. Below is an analysis of the major issues:

1. Logical Fallacies
Ad Hominem: The argument attacks individuals who play "gay-themed games" or date trans women by claiming they lack "standards," rather than engaging with the substance of their choices or preferences. This personal attack sidesteps any reasoned discussion about the topic.
Strawman: The argument misrepresents the "left" as a monolithic group that has been systematically dismantling "standards" for straight men over thirty years. It oversimplifies complex social changes and attributes them to a single ideological group without evidence.
Slippery Slope: The claim that societal changes began with calling men "sexist" and ended with the acceptance of trans women implies a direct causal progression without demonstrating how one leads to the other. This assumes a linear decline in "standards" without substantiating the connection.
Hasty Generalization: The argument generalizes that "most people" who engage in certain behaviors (playing gay-themed games or dating trans women) lack standards, based on no evidence or data, relying instead on the speaker’s personal opinion.

2. Lack of Evidence
The argument makes broad claims about societal trends (e.g., the "left" eroding standards for straight men) without providing specific examples, data, or historical context. For instance, it does not clarify what "standards" are, how they have been eroded, or how this erosion is linked to the mentioned groups or behaviors.
The assertion that the left began labeling men as "sexist" thirty years ago as part of a deliberate agenda is a historical claim that requires evidence, such as specific policies, cultural shifts, or public statements, none of which are provided.

3. Undefined Terms and Subjectivity
The term "standards" is vague and subjective, left open to interpretation without a clear definition. Without specifying what constitutes a "standard" (e.g., moral, aesthetic, cultural), the argument lacks a foundation for evaluation.
The argument assumes that the speaker’s personal standards are universally valid and superior, dismissing alternative perspectives as inherently inferior. This reflects a lack of openness to differing values or experiences.

4. Emotional Reasoning and Bias
The tone suggests frustration or resentment, particularly toward the "left," which may indicate an emotionally driven argument rather than one grounded in objective analysis. The use of terms like "SECKSIST" (mocking phonetic spelling) and the dismissive "too complicated for you" implies a sense of superiority and contempt, which can cloud rational judgment.
The argument appears to stem from a preconceived narrative about societal decline, particularly regarding gender and sexuality. This narrative is presented as self-evident without engaging with counterarguments or alternative viewpoints, suggesting confirmation bias.

5. Polarization and Stereotyping
The argument creates an "us vs. them" dichotomy, pitting "straight men" with "standards" against the "left," people who play gay-themed games, or those who date trans women. This oversimplification ignores the diversity of opinions and experiences within these groups.
It stereotypes entire groups (e.g., the left, people who engage with certain media or relationships) as morally or culturally deficient, which undermines nuanced discussion and perpetuates division.

6. Mental State Implications
The dismissive and condescending tone ("too complicated for you") suggests a lack of interest in dialogue or mutual understanding, potentially reflecting insecurity or defensiveness about your beliefs.
The fixation on a perceived decline in "standards" over thirty years may indicate anxiety about cultural change or a sense of loss of control, which could drive you to frame your argument in absolutist terms.
The reliance on vague, emotionally charged language and lack of evidence suggests you may be reacting to personal feelings of alienation or frustration rather than engaging in critical thinking.

Conclusion
The argument is logically flawed due to its reliance on fallacies (ad hominem, strawman, slippery slope, hasty generalization), lack of evidence, and undefined terms. It reflects a biased and emotionally driven perspective, characterized by polarization, stereotyping, and a dismissive tone. To improve, you would need to define "standards" clearly, provide evidence for claims about societal trends, and engage with opposing views in a more open and reasoned manner. Addressing these issues could lead to a more coherent and constructive discussion.

Alternatively you and I could go out to a chip and dales and have a gay ol time getting plastered.

[𝑅ottenfruit11]

How are you gonna reply to a post you never read with a whole lot of copy pasted nothing and then threaten to block the only person willing to be your drinking buddy? But look, I am nothing if not committed to helping you out. So committed in fact that I made a whole power point. I can't post the images though... but anywhere here is the general pitch.

Why You Should Be My Bestie and Drinking Buddy: A Totally Adorable Pitch!

Oh, hi there, cutie! Winks aggressively. Are you ready to hop aboard the friendship train with me as your conductor? I’m serving up a frothy pint of fun, a sprinkle of snark, and a whole lotta reasons why you need to be my friend and drinking buddy. So, grab a cozy blanket (I’m a cuddler, duh) and let’s dive into why I’m the ultimate pal you didn’t know you were missing!

1. My Steam Level Is Sky-High, Baby!
Picture this: me, lounging in a digital throne made of rare trading cards and shiny badges, with a Steam level so high it could make a gamer swoon. I’m basically the Tony Stark of virtual libraries, with a collection of games that screams “I have taste and dedication.” Want to team up for some co-op chaos or roast each other in a heated Stardew Valley fishing contest? I’m your gal. My Steam cred means I’m loyal, persistent, and always down for a pixelated adventure. Who wouldn’t want to sip a craft beer with that kind of clout?

2. My Banter Is Whimsical AF
If life’s a stage, I’m the quirky improv comedian stealing the spotlight. My banter? It’s like a glitter bomb of wit, sass, and just the right amount of absurdity. Whether I’m dropping puns that make you groan or spinning a silly story about my cat’s secret plans for world domination, I keep the vibes light and the giggles flowing. Pair that with a cold drink, and we’re basically starring in our own rom-com montage. Get ready for one-liners that’ll have you spitting out your IPA in laughter!

3. I’m a Social and Political Issues Guru
Don’t let my sparkly exterior fool ya—I’m a deep thinker with a PhD in “Knowing What’s Up.” From dissecting the latest political drama to unpacking systemic inequalities over a round of tequila shots, I’m your go-to for convo that’s equal parts brainy and fiery. I’ll keep you woke and entertained, dropping truth bombs with a side of charm. Wanna debate policy while clinking glasses? I’m game, and I’ll probably school you with a smile.

4. I’m Cute as a Button (Duh!)
Okay, let’s be real: I’m adorable. Picture a human cupcake with a mischievous grin and eyes that scream “let’s cause some harmless chaos.” My cuteness is scientifically proven to make your heart do a lil’ flip (I conducted the study myself, trust). Whether I’m rocking a cozy sweater or spilling my drink while gesticulating wildly, you’ll be charmed AF. Who can resist a drinking buddy who’s basically a walking hug?

5. Cuddle Queen Extraordinaire
Speaking of hugs, I’m a cuddle connoisseur. After a few drinks, when the world feels all warm and fuzzy, I’m the friend who’ll snuggle up and make you feel like you’re wrapped in a cloud. Platonic cuddles are my love language, and I’ve got a PhD in spooning (honorary, but still). Whether we’re binge-watching a cheesy rom-com or just vibing to lo-fi beats, my cuddle game is unmatched. Resistance is futile!

6. I Already Know Where You Live (No Biggie!)
Oh, and just a tiny, teensy detail: thanks to the magic of online data brokers, I might already have your address saved in my mental Rolodex. No need to stress—it’s just modern friendship prep! I’m practically your neighbor, ready to pop by with a bottle of rosé and a playlist that slaps. It’s not creepy; it’s efficient. Why waste time when we could be clinking glasses at your place tonight?

So, Why Say No?
Look, I’m the whole package: a Steam superstar, a banter boss, a socio-political savant, a certified cutie, and a cuddle champion. Plus, I’ve got the 411 on your location, so we’re basically destined to be besties. Let’s grab a drink, swap stories, and make memories that’ll have us cackling for years. Say yes, and I’ll bring the good vibes and maybe a charcuterie board. Say no, and… well, let’s just say I’m very good at sending passive-aggressive GIFs. And I know where you live. Winks ominously.

Originally posted by SteveHNo96:

Originally posted by 𝑅ottenfruit11:

Why would I do that, that's YOUR job. https://chippendales.com/tour/ there is a show in like 2 weeks that's an even drive from both of us. I am just saying we can totally do this man. I am down for a road trip if you are. We get some food, watch the show, get some drinks and just see where the night takes us. I bet once you get a few drinks in you you'll turn into an absolute party animal. You might want to sign up for something like Incogni as well because I was able to buy all of your data from Acxiom. You google a lot of questionable things for someone who claims to be on the side of the argument they are on.

Also calling me retarded is pointless, I already know that. I am gods gayest ♥♥♥♥♥♥ and god sends me his most special battles.

One more thing, ♥♥♥♥-for-brains. Your moronic ideology was proven inconclusive. In 1996, a bunch of students from the University of Georgia tried to prove a causal relationship between "homophobia" which really isn't a thing and secretly being gay. They asked a bunch of people questions and then separated them into two categories. Those that were homophobic and those that were not.

They then wired their junk to see if they would 'react' to gay porn (your favorite thing), the study found 54% of people who were homophobic had some sort of reaction and 29% of those who weren't had some sort of reaction.

Normal people would realize these numbers would tell you something was wrong with the study as the numbers are way too high in relation to the gay population, but we all know left-leaning ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ don't ever think like that, or even think at all. They just parrot what the TV tells them to think.

The study failed to account for two things. One, a boner isn't necessarily a sign of arousal. Severe anger and rage can trigger it also, and two, under extreme duress (this happens a lot to people in solitary confinement) people will drown out the circumstances they are in and use their mind to visualize something different. This happened a lot in the old west before women sold themselves as prostitutes.

As a result, the test was proven inconclusive but zero-brained ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like you still use it.

Anyways, I will give you two options.

1) ♥♥♥♥ off

or 2) Get blocked and then ♥♥♥♥ off.

I'm not even going to read the post I quoted because I'm sure like everything else you post, it will be moronic drivel and fails to account for the bigger problem. If you respond again, I will assume you want number 2, because that's what your brain is full of, is number 2.