Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
I could definitely picture me and him sitting round the computer with this game, picking up on clues together, or pointing things out that the other didn’t spot.
If I’m on the same wavelength as you here, I’d say it’s probably the perfect game for what you’re talking about.
However if you want to still enjoy a really good puzzle game and don't mind bouncing ideas back and forth with others while playing, making the progression probably a bit more fluid, then this is a pretty good game for that too. Really it just comes down to what you're looking for in one of the best puzzle/detective games out there, because Obra Dinn is definitely a one-time experience
Navigating through required info is a lot easier in that game, AND I would say the individual "cases" typically feel more dynamic and often have logical links that flow down multiple paths, so there will be a lot more to discuss amongst your group. In any scene you can go into "Thinking" mode to tie your clues together and validate your theories, this also provide a fixed narrative that you need to flesh out - so I think it would be better in a group if you avoided going into "Thinking" mode until all clues were found, and perhaps also until everyone tried coming up with some theories on their own too. That way no one would be swayed by the game's narrative, and you could see who was the closest.