Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Once your signature is on the form, what you said goes, no questions asked. You even get an achievement for saying that the captain is to blame for everyone, and "technically", the EIC still considers that legit.
MM is only of value to Henry Evans and his book, which is a separate mission entirely.
But it just seemed strange to me that the specificity that was required to satisfy Evans and his book which was, like you said, a private venture, that specificity seems to have been also retained in the investigator's official report (some killings being specified as "mutinies" without any actual physical evidence, detailing the deaths or absence of people who totally disappeared without a trace, etc), rather than the vague and uncertain reports the investigator would have had to make without the watch, or to conceal that he had access to a watch with such capabilities. All of this, and not even an actual ship to show for it since it's now at the bottom of the English channel or whatever.
But I think I understand what you're saying, which is that even if he wrote on the front page of his report, "Hey just so you know, I used a magical watch and a self-inking book to conduct this investigation," whatever clerk(s) had to handle his report probably wouldn't give these odd details a second glance and simply carry out the claims like any other paperwork and not question their superior.
I guess you can't ever discount the incredible ability of bureaucracy to render even the most curious of reports mindnumbingly boring and inconsequential.
The only question left now since the investigator now officially owns the watch, would the investigator continue to use the watch to conduct his work? Impossible to say.
Maybe, but can you imagine someone using the watch on the alleged remains of Hitler in Russia? Or Julia Wallace?
I bet the first thing an American would do is visit JFK's grave.
If the assessors ACTUALLY read the investigator's report and STILL believed every word he said, that would be like if I started telling people that the old man that lived down the street from me kept fifty orangutans in his house until it burnt down, and you have no choice but to believe me since the house is gone.
Which is all the more reason why at the time of writing my initial post, I was surprised that they seemed to be carrying out all of the investigator's fantastical claims (speared by a crab riding demon? geez, fifty pounds to this poor sod's estate).
In the end though, it appears the simple answer is that laziness and a willingness to sweep this case under the bed by the agency seems to have won out.