Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally, I'd prefer the game not make #1 spots on lists if those are the kinds of things you have to do to get there.
But as for "100 times better", there's no reason we can't have two good open world games.
Yeah but unfortunatly only of the two is good, gta 5 has HORRIBLE controls and a boring story and not much to do outside of the story in single player, y0 is way better in every way.
One is a fully open world sandbox third person shooter and the other is a hub-based beat 'em up with light RPG elements. And they don't even have one single gameplay element in common. Is it the gangster theme that makes them the same type of game for you?