Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Given that Season 1 had us question the ethics of privacy invasions in the interest of safety, and Season 2 challenged us to ponder the nature of "truth" and "facts"... Season 3 taking us towards more dangerous ground could be very very interesting.
I loved the moment in S1 where Harrison doxxed Symes, not because I agreed with Harrison's actions, but because it represented a primal attempt at shifting power back in the hands of the people. We're already inclined to side with the plight of the people - after all, isn't the point of getting to know the characters in S1 so that we feel bad when bad things happen to them?
Playing as an activitst, assisting Harrison and initiate, and waging digital war on the Nation's most powerful individuals... it'd be a rush, for sure.
So in the case of your story, I wouldn't say it as 'accidentally' release just as it is, but rather they make it so that some hackers can inject and pose as an operator inside the system. It might be interesting to make it as a hunt between which is an operator who's working for government, who is a black hat hacker working for their own purpose, who is a white hat hacker working for the people.