Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
When you learn exactly where all the bumps and dips and little hill-crests on the road are and are really careful about how and when you cross the center crown, you can push a bit harder but always need to be ready to back out if anything about your approach doesn't seem perfect. It's pretty fun trying to find what you can get away with and what you can't, but if anything goes wrong it tends to put you in a tree before you have a chance to react(or you get stuck sliding back and forth forever).
Tuning would be really nice but they decided to use the varied performance of different bikes in place of tuning the setup yourself. There are differences between each rider's bike, but they all have some of the same issues you can't tune out that way. The most noticeable difference is usually just in gearing or top speed though. Even though they show different ratings in the menus, I've never really noticed a real difference in braking performance or bike stability or cornering speed between two bikes from the same manufacturer. It might be there, but if so it's really hard to feel at least for me.
Then again, letting us setup the bikes ourselves might reveal even more issues lol.
I'm really, really surprised by how bad the communication has been and how these issues have not been resolved by now.
I wonder if they realise how commiting some resources to the development of a patch with bug fixes could really improve the community response to this game and generate a serious continued increase in game sales.
Check out No Man's Sky forum on here and be blown away how opposite the developer/publisher is with the latest update (like update 50 (made up number!)).
IF the sim was handed to a passionate crew then the TT would get the same level of ongoing attention. But these guys won't talk, simply never did, damn rude, ruder than that angry Dandy person even, for real.
Seriously, if anyone has ever gotten the time of day out of Kylotonne or Bigben, then now would be a good time to also acknowledge rather than join the club of professional ignorance?
Absolutely, I guess there's no better way to show them.
I would encourage you all to shoot an e-mail off to whatever publication you guys decide to read your game reviews on, it would be very interesting to see a video game journalists approach to this case and if they were to publish a story (of which there definitely is one here!) what response that would be met with.
As a publisher I would imagine media reception/coverage of your content is highly important and must be addressed.
So if they won't talk to us now maybe they'll talk to us then.