Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't think it's wrong to play a game with this in it necessarily. It's a personal decision and I felt compelled to express why I thought it ruins the game for someone of my convictions. If a movie has gratuitous sex or violence or content I think is unacceptable I turn it off. Same thing. I specifically call out sexual immorality because it's a large part of the satanic NWO agenda to destroy God's design for the family, and the Bible talks extensively on this subject warning against it.
If we want to look at it from a technical standpoint I think it's uncouth to take a prestige point for firing a sodomite if you don't have that trait. I will say that this has got me thinking about what I would do if I owned a business and a flamer was getting a bit overzealous. Would I fire them and risk being sued?
But men just need to release their steams especially after a long exhaustive journey, and every time the boat anchored in port there should be chances that your crews would catch something unpleasant.
Admittedly though, the event does not in any way make this connection clear.
Gay people? In MY videogames?
I'm calling the police!
"Just say no"
Uhmmmm..... that might not... "work out"... as you hoped.
"...I squeezed that sperm till a strange sort of insanity came over me; and I found myself unwittingly squeezing my co-laborers' hands in it, mistaking their hands for the gentle globules. Such an abounding, affectionate, friendly, loving feeling did this avocation beget; that at last I was continually squeezing their hands, and looking up into their eyes..."
This is about homosexuality & sex. Melville is not literally talking about sailors squeezing each others' hands - he is talking about them having sex with each other, using metaphor.
The 'funny' thing is that Melville's social commentary here is in the negative: he deliberately frames the sexual relationship between Ishmael & Queequeg as destructive, with every escalation of passion causing harm to either one of the men or both of them, until Queequeg death. The metaphor is homophobic.
The OP is so bigoted that they don't even realize that the homosexual commentary of the text condemns the practice; all they saw was Teh Gehy and they had a kneejerk reaction.
Subtext is fine but along with a large amount of people I assume, I don't want to play a game centered around homosexuality. I want to play a game centered around the historical events that lead to adventures like these.
Sodomy may have occured in the past like many other historical events in this game, however, the topic is not as crucial in the leading events of hunting for Mody Di__.
I personally like how this game is for the most part and I feel the sodomy going on is a perfectly viable attribute that can occur as an "event".
Homosexuality is absolutely a central focus of the book. That doesn't mean it needs to be central to the game, but saying it is superfluous or just a dash of color is missing the whole point of the text.