Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
System A
AMD Threadripper 1950X on Gigabyte X399 Designare motherboard
System B
Intel Core I9-7980XE on Asus ROG Rampage VI Extreme motherboard.
Now bear in mind I did -NOT- overclock either of these systems yet. I just installed them 100% stock and installed 3dmark and clicked run. But, do also bear in mind that system A does default to 2666 Mhz ram, and System B does default to 2400 Mhz ram.
Results:
System A (AMD) - 15,685 3DMarks. 17,660 Graphics. 9,602 CPU.
System B (Intel) - 16,171 3DMarks. 17,660 Graphics. 10,943 CPU.
So yes the Intel systems are faster.
And other people have achieved 24k with AMD Threadripper and overclocking, what's your point?
I was just proving it's faster than AMD is all. It needs some binning action to get some high scores, I don't have the time or effort to try.
You're probably using different RAM when making your comparison between the i9 and 1950x, RAM makes a HUGE difference in CPU score with these high core-count chips.
foxfags first post states his scores showing the opposite of your hypothesis. I also happen to have a comparison saved which shows:
- RAM clock speed :: CPU model // CPU score
- @2133MHz RAM :: 1950x // 8753
- @2133MHz RAM :: 7980xe // 10525
- @4700MHz RAM :: 1950x // 9602
- @4700MHz RAM :: 7980xe // 10943
The people with >25k score on AMD chips are top-bin sampled with high OCs/thread
tr 1950x stock + 4700hz + 2 1080 ti extreme = 16807, 17777 graphics 12841 cpu
i9 is marginally faster, havent even OC'd yet
Good luck with the i9, it's a terrible overclocker, made even more difficult by it's 100MHz stepping compared to TR's 25MHz. Buuuut because of it's high base score and higher core count it factors increadibly well with RAM speed. I got an extra 1500 (!!!) points in timespy CPU score with a stock i9 over a binned OCed TR, both with ~5600 MHz RAM (safe voltage).
If those fella's with the 25k scores threw a 7980XE into their binned RAM rigs I reckon they'd get outstanding scores. Overall:
The i9 is definatly a better timespy scorer than the TR when using top-binned RAM, I think we can chalk this thread as answered hah