AMD Bias

[OriginalGrubby]

Can we fix the CPU ranks, the AMDs you've got vs the Intels should not be ranked the way they are. You've got top of the line Intel chips below the woest AMD chips... That's just crap

[KEKW]

/r/amd vs /r/madlads

*Grabs Popcorn*

[MonkehMaster]

intel > amd

"holds popcorn up to catch the salt"

[| kEv_]

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR1.TRC0.A0.H0.TRS0&_nkw=AMD+Phenom+X4+9500&_sacat=0

are you Court Jester? from OCAU?

LMFAO! haters gonna hate, even in a simulator...

[MonkehMaster]

Originally posted by | kEv_:

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR1.TRC0.A0.H0.TRS0&_nkw=AMD+Phenom+X4+9500&_sacat=0

are you Court Jester? from OCAU?

LMFAO! haters gonna hate, even in a simulator...

garbage.

[| kEv_]

omg massive fail on my part, i copied your post but its pasted something else HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so, are you court jester from OCAU? he's the only other person i know who so blindly defends intel - (i have no preference)

[Metallos]

Originally posted by MonkehMaster:

no, sorry but fact is intel beats amd hands down, intel xeon cpus beat amd on work/servers and in general intel beats amd in gaming.

Those are alternative facts and no facts because there are NO Xeons in the game.

[Thaldoras]

Epyc > Xeon [www.newegg.com]

[MonkehMaster]

Originally posted by Metallos:

Originally posted by MonkehMaster:

no, sorry but fact is intel beats amd hands down, intel xeon cpus beat amd on work/servers and in general intel beats amd in gaming.

Those are alternative facts and no facts because there are NO Xeons in the game.

that has nothing to do with xeons being in the game, irl facts xeons beat amd in work/servers and intel in general beat amd in gaming.

facts are facts, you will have to learn them or just deal with being wrong.

[Metallos]

And who took the Xeons in the discussion? It was YOU.
And I know that the Intels are better for gaming* but there's not only gaming in the world.

*) Exept low-budget casual gaming / allround -> Ryzen based APU, especially with the advantage of a more powerful CPU than Intel + dedicated GPU for the same price.

[MonkehMaster]

Originally posted by Metallos:

And who took the Xeons in the discussion? It was YOU.
And I know that the Intels are better for gaming* but there's not only gaming in the world.

*) Exept low-budget casual gaming / allround -> Ryzen based APU, especially with the advantage of a more powerful CPU than Intel + dedicated GPU for the same price.

intel > amd

hands down.

[Kärran]

You can't claim it's facts without actually showing any facts.
All you seem to be saying is "x > y" and then putting the word "facts" at the end. That won't change anyones opinion.

[MonkehMaster]

intel > amd

facts.

[Urban_L]

A workaround would be to implement different benchmarks and different performance metrics for multi-core and single core performances, with the Ryzen series winning the former (with higher core/thread count) and the Core i series winning the latter (with higher IPC and clock). (3DMark Fire Strike would be good for single core IMO)

[Metallos]

And remember: It's a game!

(and in real life you don't have those stupid "I want xxxx 3Dmarks" jobs)

[Thaldoras]

Originally posted by MonkehMaster:

Originally posted by Apathy:

Ryzen=good at everything. better than intel at non-gaming.
Intel=better at gaming,but falls to Ryzen in non-gaming benchmarks.

The difference is really negligible. they're both great.

yet intel xeon cpu's beat amd all day long in work loads and intel in general beat amd in gaming...

amd fanboy logic at its best LOL. <---(not saying you per say but all amd fanboys in general).

bruh. Stop trolling. The xeon platinum 8180 is barely better than the Epyc 7601. But the Epyc 7601 has an insane amount of PCE lanes and other features due to having more cores and using ininity fabric. Plus it is like half the price of the its xeon counterpart.