Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
ranting aside, do you have a list of constructive points to show for these inaccuracies?
One: Mockery is spelled with a K not H
Two: Any baseball fan with any knowledge of the game will tell you that Cal Ripken Jr was a great shortstop in his prime and was among the new wave of bigger power hitting shortstops revolutionizing the position. He is not 'ONLY' in the hall because of the streak, though it certainly helped.
The first is annoying, the second is something basically any fan near or over the age of thirty will fight you over.
Unrelated note: If you're going to mock a Ripken please mock Billy, he's a far easier target.
So Ripken never:
- put up a career 92.5 WAR (no player with a WAR that high is not in the HOF, except for PEDs)
- finished his career with 3,184 hits, easily surpassing the gold standard for hits for HOF induction
- socked 431 home runs, playing as a SS
- finished his career with a +310 fielding rating and was one of the best at positioning at SS of all time
- won Rookie of the Year and two MVPs
I mean please, if you think he "ONLY" made the HOF because of the consecutive games streak, you know nothing of the sport yourself and should just shut it.
No the players from Lehman are not perfectly rated, but if every one were perfect, if that much detail went in to every player in history, the game would probably cost $1000 for all the work it would take to edit the rosters.
The 2018 rosters though aren't bad at all. I never agree 100% with how OOTP rates 100% of the players, but it's pretty reasonable ths year - better than last year IMO.
We all missed something obvious. Was the 180+ injury rating blue? In OOTP higher numbers are usually better so a 180+(on a 1-100 scale I assume) and blue numbers are exceptional, I'll bet the 180 is a great number which means Cal is basically immortal, check on the injury rating for someone you know had injury issues you'll probably find a low number in red, the color coding in OOTP is from best to worst blue-green-yellow-orange-red. I strongly suspect you just misunderstood how the rating system applies to injuries.
Or give the simulation a chance and play a season or two or seven, I'll bet that Cal won't get hurt.
Is that the case? If so, whats the point of it being called an "accurate" baseball sim if the game insists nobody will ever be better in a stat?
Because that's ridiculous if you make the international pool deeper, given baseball draws from not even 15% of the world's pop that if a HOF talent shows up they make it impossible exceed "the best" at some point in a rating stat.
What?
Did you bother going through the different settings, where you can recalculate ratings every single season based on their actual career stats? Did you see that you can even force the AI to use the original lineups? I personally like the "what if" factor so I don't turn those on, but if realism is what you are seeking, you can absolutely set it up to replay Cal's entire career.
1. badly twisted knee
2. back injury
3. shoulder tear
4. second injury to knee
In all four cases, he was given the authority to decide if he was going to play or not, based on his HOF caliber of play. Any team with an All-Star caliber player will let him decide if he plays. Cal Ripken Jr was taught a very imporant lesson by his father when he was just a bat boy for the Orioles: "never let your team down. Show up every day and work hard because they are depending on you to do nothing less."
His rating isn't a measure of some superhuman ability to never be hurt. It is a measure of his willingness to play through pain, and still put up league leading performances while hurt.
That, sir, is why he is in the Hall of Fame.
Think about that the next time you call out sick from work because you have a sore throat.
As far as the Ripken issue is concerned, I play a lot of historical leagues and part of the fun for many of us is the "what if?" factor of the replay. You can play it closer to real life, if you wish, by selecting the real lineups option. Or, as others have stated, it is a simple matter of editing the injury proneness rating.