Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You need to have the required pet active in order to gain the Feat when you click on it, not just owned.
I noticed that some of the event posts meandered after the original post is resolved but the meandering is too unpredictable, so it helps to have a detail like this highlighted sometimes instead of buried under other details.
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/861738022413872034/546808A3CDBEA0FBBC5855B34E48C4397F5B1EBD/
No, it does not. It says having the pet, nothing about needing it active.
Which means that if you have clicked one, it is active and the others are not. You are not getting the spells or bonuses of the inactive monsters, only the one you selected to accompany you... as a pet.
There's no need to be rude about it, Slayingknaves.
You've missed the point. My original post is about achieving the feats, not using the monsters. Further, I believe Slayingknaves is getting at the rudeness of RogueFireWolf's responses. However, I do agree there is no need to respond to rudeness in kind.
No, I didn't miss the point, I was pointing out how one can equate the active monster to being the pet, by the description in the English tooltip, which is relevant to getting the feat.
Also RFW was not being rude, they told you that there was no need to make new threads on the subject as the question had already been answered in another thread, and you decided to argue why the other thread was not sufficient. And some others decided to jump in and be overtly rude about it... Seems like this one is meandering as well!