No Rampage?

[Dr. Feelgood]

I just finished it - is this a joke? You play as one of the 4 Horsemen, and you don't even get your horse?!

What a disappointment. Especially after releasing the Trailer that shows off Rampage when folks were questioning the horse's whereabouts in the game.

[Leon]

you did but it got killed... so?

[lieutenantkirtar]

I started thinking near the end that it would turn out to be a sin illusion that your horse was dead but it never happened.

[JorgeJunior]

This is no place for a horse.
Where would you ride a horse in Darksiders 3?

[Dee]

Originally posted by JorgeJunior:

This is no place for a horse. :reaperform:
Where would you ride a horse in Darksiders 3?

exactly..

[Demajen]

Originally posted by Dr. Feelgood:

I just finished it - is this a joke? You play as one of the 4 Horsemen, and you don't even get your horse?!

What a disappointment. Especially after releasing the Trailer that shows off Rampage when folks were questioning the horse's whereabouts in the game.

The trailer was to set up Fury's emotional connection to Rampage, about how the horse is the only thing she truly loves -- and, I believe, to set up future conflict with whoever organised Rampage's death. (Assuming we weren't originally going to find out more in the game but content was cut...)

Whatever the case, Fury herself addresses your point: she says in game, "The horseman is not defined by the horse".

[Hawksbri]

Without the emotional distresses caused by Rampage's death to Wrath, and then humiliating consuming of his corpse by Gluttony, Fury would not have done nearly as savagely a job as we did with her, killing anything and everything in her path... except humans and Makers. I'm sure with the DLC we are all promised, from a series of games that never truly disappoints to tell a beautiful story, I'm sure we will be given the fight on whoever murdered Rampage...

As Death is obviously missing, we might see his horse join Fury... we have also yet to truly see or hear the story of the final sibling... Pestilence, pistol-bearer and shape-shifter... or about his Horse.

Chances are, with Pestilence, we will have a gaem more akin to Ubisoft's Splinter Cell and Assassin's Creed? Hide amongst the remnants of demons or angels, killing them left and right, and then hiding again?

[Demajen]

Originally posted by toadragon:

But with the horse and pistol the game could have been more interesting and without these stupid feelings. :cozycastondeath: Less emotions more bloody battles.

Considering how dull, clunky and underdeveloped the horse combat was in Darksiders 1 and 2, and how lackluster the pistol mechanics felt in both games, I'm not entirely sure why people are so up in arms about the lack of Rampage in Darksiders 3.

Originally posted by toadragon:

In this game all are too emotional than they should . Only they did not cry. There had to be anger and revenge in the game . I only saw confusion and complaint. In the other two games there was not as much emotional junk as in this game.

You didn't see anger and revenge?! You didn't see Fury thrust a chunk of metal through her chest and rage at Wrath? You didn't see Fury rage at Usiel or go out of her way to even seek out the angels for revenge? You didn't see her scream at Lust for making her bretheren kneel in the illusion?

Originally posted by toadragon:

Horse looks like a pony. It looks like an ordinary horse. In the other two parts the horses looked fierce and not fluffy.

I'm pretty certain that Rampage uses the same model as Ruin, with different textures and some smoothed out polygons for higher resolution, in much the same way as the modellers did for the extant horsemen, Charred Council, and so on. (There's some stuff about that from the artists on Artstation). Despair obviously got a different sculpt due to the nature of its physique.

Originally posted by toadragon:

When Fury saw the head of the horse, she made such a faint shout I thought it was a joke.There was so dumb drama that was worse than twilight.

I think the point of that was that she reins in her anger much more easily by that stage in her journey. When she first saw Rampage fall, she screams bloody murder in some fairly impressive voice work. By the time she gets to Gluttony, she's accepted the loss of her beloved steed, as well as accepting certain fundamental flaws of her own character, and this is why she's able to defeat Wrath who, in his final cutscene, asks her how Fury can fight without anger. She's realised that constantly raging at the world isn't productive.

Just my take on it anyway.

[Кашерна]

Originally posted by Hawksbri:

the final sibling... Pestilence

Strife, actually.

[Dee]

Originally posted by toadragon:

for Demajen

1 horse was only useful in the wilderness.
2 was useful for fast moving 2 was longer.
The pistols were not strong in battle but were useful for small monsters.
Better than the boomerang that is slow and does not go far.
In 1 and 2 there were angelic and demonic weapons that were very cool and powerful.
Fury does not appear as the person who describes it. More like a confused child .
She does not show any fury. She has gone through emotional development.
It spoils the game as a nasty drama.I was expecting a real game like the first two battles of blood and violence.I wanted to see apocalypse and I got crying babies.
The bosses are almost the same, and there is not much thrill in the battle and talk longer than the battle.There is not much thinking about defeating him.

1. yeah and you don't have enough room for a horse in that game
2. now you can sprint down these narrow paths and you don't have to constantly press charge or dodge to move faster
3. the pistols were only there for solving puzzles and killing those damn worms
4. which angelic/demonic weapons? are you sure you played darksiders and not dmc?
5. war too learned to control his rage to some point, so what? is he now a child as well? also, how can you call somebody, who underwent a personal growth, who matured, a child?
6. and you got blood and violence - a lot of that in fact; and you actually got to see the conflict from a different kind of perspective, because war is so much more than only blood and violence - it's a lot of suffering.
7. well, I don't know about you, but to me the bosses of DS2 all felt the same, simply because I could kill almost all of them in one shot on apocalyptic, because arcane crit and arcane crit chance were that powerfull - so what?

[QUANTUM MECHANICS c000021a]

Best game for virtual horse riding is Red Dead Redemption 2, its very realistic for ladies too realistic because of certain details...

[cranialocially]

Originally posted by Dr. Feelgood:

I just finished it - is this a joke? You play as one of the 4 Horsemen, and you don't even get your horse?!

What a disappointment. Especially after releasing the Trailer that shows off Rampage when folks were questioning the horse's whereabouts in the game.

ya but where would you ride it?