Does anyone feel Apocalyptic mode is a bit unbalanced?

[AngeryBlueBerry]

So, I decided to go straight for apocalyptic mode since I aim on getting all the achievements for this game, but for some reason I feel this difficulty setting is rather unbalanced. I understand it's suppose to be hard and a challenge, but my god some of these normal enemies would literally one-shot me even with my health leveled up. I can understand some bigger enemies being tough, but these normal enemies should'nt be able to just one-shot you like that. I feel like the damage output for some of these enemies (the one's who's weapon glow before striking) needs to be readjusted.

I palyed all the dark souls game and bloodborne, and I feel like those games understood how to balance the enemies better than this. Weird comparison I know, but I am bringing it up for difficulty comparison sake. Hell, I even beaten Apocalyptic mode on both of the previous Darksiders games and they were no where near as difficult as this.

Again, I can understand the big tough enemies being able to one-shot but these other normal goons should not be able to do that. Should they be readjusted? What do you all think?

[Homeless.]

It's a bit on the silly side sometimes I agree, but the most infuriating thing for me about this game is the lack of map

[R34]

You dont really need map, lot of vulgrim save points and its not that big...

[Astronimo]

Not even close. It's the toughest difficulty, so it need to be challenging. In any way, if will find secret places, you will be able to deal with those trash much easier. Most easier part comes with Finding all Humans and gettins Stasis Hollow + fortification rune

[Mazile]

Nah, in previous games on apocalyptic mobs also do large amount of damage and if you're reckless you will die very fast
Problem in Ds3 is combat mechanic it's very different from previous games imho
With the patch since they increased i-frames on dodge combat for me become more enjoyable but not as good as in previous games but it won't be possible