Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
The problem is not that they made mistakes, but that the movie tries to brush them aside as if they weren't mistakes at all.
When Pong Krell made bad errors in the Battle of Umbara, the clones took notice (it later showed that Pong was betrayed the Republic.
When Luke chose to skip training, Yoda took notice (and Luke lost his hand).
Even when Luke chooses to not train Rey, Rey takes notice.
But when Purple Hair, Rose, and Leia make their errors, the movie wants you to think that these are heroic feats.
This still doesn't explain Baby Revan, Poe needing to blindly follow Purple Hair even though her logic was clearly flawed, and Finn needing to be "saved" by Rose (I will get into that more in this next quote).
The problem is not that she survived, but that unless Luke showed up then the Resistance would be completely destroyed.
He was also in the original trilogy so if he didn't do something before they killed him off, then the fans would get extra angry.
Her orders were flawed so he took matters into his own hands to save the Resistance.
Also see my first point.
See my first point.
Some rich people want to be rich so they can help more people in the end and some rich people consider their wealth to be the harvest of a long and honest hard earned labor.
Padme was a queen yet she was still considered good. Leia was a princess yet she was good as well.
Also Disney itself is run by a bunch of very rich people. They don't even follow the ideas of the movie.
Here's something to think about.
Rich person: Why do I have this money when I could have given it to someone poorer.
Poor person: Why did I accept this gift when I could have given it to someone poorer.
Very poor person: I never worked and yet I still got some money, what's the point in working at all?
Rich person: Why work when all these people aren't working yet they still get money?
TLJ has no "wisdom". In-fact, it's a pretender. It wants you to think it's "deep", but there's nothing to it. And you fell right into the trap.
rip nuke corvett fell into a plot hole never to be seen again
A good strong female character is one who works off of the other characters, is a good character on their own, and must not be above the other characters for no good reason. It also works best if the story would change greatly if she was a he.
A forced strong female character is one who is place above characters (usually male characters) for no good reason, is usually boring character on their own, and the story wouldn't much at all if she was a he.
Some good examples of good strong female characters are Ahsoka Tano, Wyldstyle (Lego Movie), Leia Organa, Ellen Ripley (Alien), and Padme Amidala.
A great science fiction show (that Disney owns) with good strong female characters is Wander Over Yonder. Sylvia works well as a mother figure for Wander and a rival/temorary companion to Commander Peepers, and Lord Dominator works well as a rival/lover to Lord Hater (at least he hopes that she loves him). If Disney learned one thing from that show it should have been how to make a great strong female character, too bad they shut it down.