Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
#ShareDeck #DuelLinks
I have been playing around with the a few variations of the deck I have and it has not happened since, so who knows, maybe it was an enemy effect, I swear I looked over their cards multiple times ahaha
No need for the tone. Proof comes in all shape and sizes. Description of a bug if OP believes they come across one is also proof. To deny a method to lead to that proof all because it doesn't show a bigger picture so OP have to use screen shot or a video to show proof is rather misguided. Jumping straight to fault than a possible bug doesn't help the situation its best to think in all possible ways before faulting OP discovery.
I've came across one player who use this on me weeks ago. I've check their deck to find no forbidden ones in the names of each card in a 15 or 20 card deck. They did have 3 Exodia the legendary incarnate cards in their deck with light monsters. My guess is the description is wrong with that card and haven't been fix. Card effects were being display correctly like the real Exodia deck that came before this one showing the forbidden pieces of each Exodia to me before it was summon to end the match.
Typos are not bugs but I can't explained why any card can be use with Exodia the legendary incarnate cards. It might be a visual bug that is rare for players to encounter and those are the ones often get denied to exist.
There is no tone, also wrong. They need proof because it isn't a bug and usually and has been just them not looking at something, even if they looked at everything closely there is still always something that they looked over. They aren't being descriptive, they said they looked at everything and that's it, they didn't describe the situation at all they didn't say everything on the field and in the GY they didn't say what's been played, we have no evidence that this is a bug other than the OP's word. If they have proof it's a bug they need to show it otherwise it isn't a bug because just like every other time this has happened it's cause of something they overlooked
Asking for proof means I want to be proven wrong, that this is a bug, that's what they are claiming. Why do you think I said "If it's a bug you need proof", because they made the claim it's a bug and I doubt it is so they have to show proof, this is all in reference to them making 100% certainty this was a bug
There is no tone behind it it's basic reasoning and understanding of claims
Fair, in this community "pics or it didn't happen" isn't just a meme.
I can answer this piece for you, exodia cards are added to your deck by Yugi Muto's ability Grandpa's Cards, so by looking through someones deck you would not find any cards other then legendary incarnate with the name