WOOULD RED EYES DRAGOON DESTROY DUELINKS???

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

This card is verry powerful and can be hard to take down even more so in duel links cards that target it can not remove it from play other cards that destroy all monsters also do not work on it mirror force cant destroy it dark hole raigeki dark hole also etc cant touch it it also can negate card effects if you negate a monsters card effect destroy that monster as well as this card gains 1000 atk if it negated a monster effect and destroy it this would be a huge buff to the red eyes deck in duel links and tip the scale in power pushing blue eyes decks down under it since many cards cant touch it boon of moon cant touch it cause it targets cards like qwakeing mirror force can flip it face down buy since that card isnt in duel links its no help so do you think it will be added to duel link and if so how would konami balance it since its so powerful and many cards that could deal with it greatly arent in duel links i love this card a lot but even i know it could tip the scale in duel links alone

[Soda]

Too long, didn't read.

Answer: Yes.

Edit: after reading, your logic is "It would help red eyes". Did you not consider that since it can be generically summoned with REF, ANY deck can run it? Open red eyes fusion, summon Dragoon. Going first is 3 negates, going second is 4.

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

Too long, didn't read.

Answer: Yes.

Edit: after reading, your logic is "It would help red eyes". Did you not consider that since it can be generically summoned with REF, ANY deck can run it? Open red eyes fusion, summon Dragoon. Going first is 3 negates, going second is 4.

true any deck could run it but red eyes deck gets more from it making it a bigger threat

[LDvergil]

Are you serious my dude? You asking is the all mighty classical TOWER, Dragoon be added into the game?

Heads will roll for much less around here!

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Are you serious my dude? You asking is the all mighty classical TOWER, Dragoon be added into the game?

Heads will roll for much less around here!

i asked would it destory duel links if it was added because it snot banned or limited

[LDvergil]

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Are you serious my dude? You asking is the all mighty classical TOWER, Dragoon be added into the game?

Heads will roll for much less around here!

i asked would it destory duel links if it was added because it snot banned or limited

I see your point but my point still stands.

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

i asked would it destory duel links if it was added because it snot banned or limited

I see your point but my point still stands.

but you also forget not all of the blue eys dragon cards are in duel links you cant obtain blue eyes chaos max dragon its only 1 copy via skill or like blue eyes abyss dragon or blue eyes alternitive ultimate dragon these cards arent in duel links this goose for tons of other ark types like the magician ark type were missing ton of them red eyes ark type and one of my fav types the galaxy eyes dragon/photon ark type all of them can be over bearing if added to duel links fully

[Soda]

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Are you serious my dude? You asking is the all mighty classical TOWER, Dragoon be added into the game?

Heads will roll for much less around here!

i asked would it destory duel links if it was added because it snot banned or limited

Dragoon is actually banned in the OCG. Which is what duel links is derived from. And you're using the name fallacy again. Just because it has "red eyes" in its name doesn't mean red eyes will benefit more. This is the equivalency of someone saying "Maxx C should be unbanned because it gives the weaker decks a chance." Meanwhile, the meta decks get Maxx C too. Have you considered the damage of dragoon if a deck hard summoned it? Its summoning conditions are:
Dark Magician + Red-Eyes Black Dragon OR 1 Dragon effect monster.

It does not require Red Eyes at all. Just play Dark Magician with an oppressive DMC and generic GY plusing Dragons such as Eclipse and you have a major problem on your hands.

Don't use the new or casual player problem: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Not to mention Dragoons burn and attack gain upon destruction of a card it negates.

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

i asked would it destory duel links if it was added because it snot banned or limited

Dragoon is actually banned in the OCG. Which is what duel links is derived from. And you're using the name fallacy again. Just because it has "red eyes" in its name doesn't mean red eyes will benefit more. This is the equivalency of someone saying "Maxx C should be unbanned because it gives the weaker decks a chance." Meanwhile, the meta decks get Maxx C too. Have you considered the damage of dragoon if a deck hard summoned it? Its summoning conditions are:
Dark Magician + Red-Eyes Black Dragon OR 1 Dragon effect monster.

It does not require Red Eyes at all. Just play Dark Magician with an oppressive DMC and generic GY plusing Dragons such as Eclipse and you have a major problem on your hands.

Don't use the new or casual player problem: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Not to mention Dragoons burn and attack gain upon destruction of a card it negates.

duel links isnt useing stuff from the ocg is it it useing tgc stuff and what do you mean use new or casuela player i never said anything about them why you bringing up the ocg when they arent useing ocg cards in the game

[Soda]

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

Dragoon is actually banned in the OCG. Which is what duel links is derived from. And you're using the name fallacy again. Just because it has "red eyes" in its name doesn't mean red eyes will benefit more. This is the equivalency of someone saying "Maxx C should be unbanned because it gives the weaker decks a chance." Meanwhile, the meta decks get Maxx C too. Have you considered the damage of dragoon if a deck hard summoned it? Its summoning conditions are:
Dark Magician + Red-Eyes Black Dragon OR 1 Dragon effect monster.

It does not require Red Eyes at all. Just play Dark Magician with an oppressive DMC and generic GY plusing Dragons such as Eclipse and you have a major problem on your hands.

Don't use the new or casual player problem: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Not to mention Dragoons burn and attack gain upon destruction of a card it negates.

duel links isnt useing stuff from the ocg is it it useing tgc stuff and what do you mean use new or casuela player i never said anything about them why you bringing up the ocg when they arent useing ocg cards in the game

...............

Yes, it's the OCG. It follows the rules of the OCG, it handles like the OCG, it is based out of Japan: which is the OCG. Just because the cards have English words on them (depending on language) doesn't mean it's not the OCG.

[wizard master結城晶子リ]

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

duel links isnt useing stuff from the ocg is it it useing tgc stuff and what do you mean use new or casuela player i never said anything about them why you bringing up the ocg when they arent useing ocg cards in the game

...............

Yes, it's the OCG. It follows the rules of the OCG, it handles like the OCG, it is based out of Japan: which is the OCG. Just because the cards have English words on them (depending on language) doesn't mean it's not the OCG.

can you back up this claim

[Soda]

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

...............

Yes, it's the OCG. It follows the rules of the OCG, it handles like the OCG, it is based out of Japan: which is the OCG. Just because the cards have English words on them (depending on language) doesn't mean it's not the OCG.

can you back up this claim

I shouldn't need to. DL plays with OCG rules.

Go test a ruling and see if it follows OCG or TCG.
Chain link 1 : MST to destroy a set card.
Chain link 2 : set card activated that will special summon a monster with an on summon effect (such as a tellarknight) from gy and equips it. (This is important as the summoned monster must leave the field before chain finishes resolving.)

Chain resolves.

In the TCG, the on summon effect will not activate due to TCG rules. In the OCG, it will.

I'll give you 2 guesses of which Duel Links processes.

Next card is desperado barrel dragon. This example will only make sense if you understand how PSCT works. Since I don't have the effort to type it out for you, I'll assume you do - which I doubt.

Desperado's ENGLISH text reads "(activate): flip 3 coins; destroy cards blah blah..."
In the TCG, you will flip the coins BEFORE your opponent has the chance to respond to it.
In the OCG, the coin flipping is not treated as the "cost" and the coins are flipped on resolution of the card.

You have 2 guesses for which Duel Links processes.

On summon hand triggers... Actually that might be too complicated for you.. so I'll just skip ahead and tell you it's OCG hand trigger rules.

Seriously, if you're gonna try asking for proof of something, you'd better have something to back up your claim instead of just saying "prove your claim".

[LDvergil]

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

...............

Yes, it's the OCG. It follows the rules of the OCG, it handles like the OCG, it is based out of Japan: which is the OCG. Just because the cards have English words on them (depending on language) doesn't mean it's not the OCG.

can you back up this claim

I'm going to intercept because your discussion is starting to deviate. So yeah, bro just look at this effect...

"Dark Magician" + "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" or 1 Dragon Effect Monster
Cannot be destroyed by card effects. Neither player can target this card with card effects. During your Main Phase: You can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls, and if you do, inflict damage to your opponent equal to that monster's original ATK. You can use this effect a number of times per turn up to the number of Normal Monsters used as Fusion Material for this card. Once per turn, when a card or effect is activated (Quick Effect): You can discard 1 card; negate the activation, and if you do, destroy that card, and if you do that, this card gains 1000 ATK.

[Soda]

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

can you back up this claim

I'm going to intercept because your discussion is starting to deviate. So yeah, bro just look at this effect...

"Dark Magician" + "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" or 1 Dragon Effect Monster
Cannot be destroyed by card effects. Neither player can target this card with card effects. During your Main Phase: You can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls, and if you do, inflict damage to your opponent equal to that monster's original ATK. You can use this effect a number of times per turn up to the number of Normal Monsters used as Fusion Material for this card. Once per turn, when a card or effect is activated (Quick Effect): You can discard 1 card; negate the activation, and if you do, destroy that card, and if you do that, this card gains 1000 ATK.

You and I already went over all that. You stated it was a Towers and I stated the negates and burn. We just used less words

[LDvergil]

Originally posted by LDvergil:

Originally posted by wizard master結城晶子リ:

can you back up this claim

I'm going to intercept because your discussion is starting to deviate. So yeah, bro just look at this effect...

"Dark Magician" + "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" or 1 Dragon Effect Monster
Cannot be destroyed by card effects. Neither player can target this card with card effects. During your Main Phase: You can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls, and if you do, inflict damage to your opponent equal to that monster's original ATK. You can use this effect a number of times per turn up to the number of Normal Monsters used as Fusion Material for this card. Once per turn, when a card or effect is activated (Quick Effect): You can discard 1 card; negate the activation, and if you do, destroy that card, and if you do that, this card gains 1000 ATK.

This card my dude makes Chaos Max Dragon look like Blue Eyes Alternative Dragon. I'm really surprised you're not seeing how Powerful as F$%& is written all over this card!

[LDvergil]

Originally posted by メイドの召喚獣ーレイ:

Originally posted by LDvergil:

I'm going to intercept because your discussion is starting to deviate. So yeah, bro just look at this effect...

"Dark Magician" + "Red-Eyes Black Dragon" or 1 Dragon Effect Monster
Cannot be destroyed by card effects. Neither player can target this card with card effects. During your Main Phase: You can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls, and if you do, inflict damage to your opponent equal to that monster's original ATK. You can use this effect a number of times per turn up to the number of Normal Monsters used as Fusion Material for this card. Once per turn, when a card or effect is activated (Quick Effect): You can discard 1 card; negate the activation, and if you do, destroy that card, and if you do that, this card gains 1000 ATK.

You and I already went over all that. You stated it was a Towers and I stated the negates and burn. We just used less words :shigure2:

I don't think he's fully grasping Dragoons prowess. Care to give him some more comparisons and food for thought?