Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hell even Cyber Angel, if they commit too much in one turn they could be screwed if the player doesnt draw into the right recovery quick enough.
Also Amazoness normally have more than one Onsalught (thanks to multiple princess) which means even if you destroy it with discarding they can flood hte field again and again. If you use Cyclone you draw down your own LP making the win condition that much more prevelent. It also doesn't help the "broken" cards you mention outside of Beiige who isn't even that much of a threat compared to other Dark World monsters in this game.
I think you're considering bad players as being the epitome of making fiends broken. That's just not the case. Masked Hero in general can be stopped by removal of Anki (or multiple Anki) but he's still a threat for most decks, and even then Amazoness is more of a Rogue deck or more anti-meta than anything.
Also, the reason Sylvans are broken is not because they are inherently good, but because they can RNG win consistently based on nuking the field and excavating specific cards. If they fail on excavation or nuking the field they lose. The issue is how RNG-riffic they are which is uncompetitive (and although luck plays a factor in all matches and other arch types: Coin flips/etc.) Generally those decks don't auto-win based on flipping a coin or rolling that die. IE: Snipe Hunter doesn't auto win just by nuking your field with dice rolls.
Bakura learns restart too I believe.
They're not broken because they're not . It's not about just consistent 1TKO, just because they have options doesn't make them misbalanced. REBS has many fo the same features including the ability to negate targetting spells and traps thanks to its equip effect, is it broken? No.
Broken in card games = Over centralized to make the meta compete with said cards at all costs with no alternative options or viable within reasonable means.
Fiends lose to all kinds of decks. Just because they have options doesn't make them over centralized.
They special out a huge beater, I have 3500 beaters I can summon turn one. They have removal? So do a lot of decks, there's is more luck based bar that one dark world card that requires another card just to make practical use of it. IF they have full field you can't. Snipe Hunt fails on 1 and 6. Which means it's not always consistent.
What do they have in your mind that makes them inherently broken? What? Because you beat a bunch of bad players that makes them broken? Congrats, I guess level up must be broken considering I've ran through people with Mystic/Silent synergy deck.
Now, why is Sylvans broken? Because the only graveyard prevention is not reliable, requires discard on a turn one of four cards (leaving you vulnerable to nuke and having no cards remaining) and it becomes a luck based fiasco. It's not about the nuking, It's about the fact if they get lucky they can pull wins based on luck alone. Excate 1-3, if you get Rose Lover, Carrots, and or one nuke, you win. Which is uncompetitive. I just explained this. Rose Lover also negates Traps on the special summoned monster (Special summon + Protection to traps for a turn) and they flood after the nuke. They cover all advantages via a lucky excavate with few counter options other than have a 2700 beater turn one without it getting nuked, or running the crappy counter cards which have no real reliablility. Can fiends do this? No, and if they do not reliably.
Even Umi is more misbalanced than Fiends, just because if you have less than ample ST removal Fortress and SSA can lock you down to the point there is no hope of winning. Can Fiends do that? No. Not even close.
Can fiends send monsters to the banished zone (out of play) consistently, preventing a return to the field, special summon a field that can banish your opponent monster or force them to submit due ot reversal of battle damage (Swordswoman)? No.
Even aliens are more intimidating than Fiends (Darkworld, and Snipe Hunt, and Archfiend overrun decks)
They're good, but that's about it. Being good doesn't mean over centralized instantly. Being good doesn't mean broken.