Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Worms are a control deck, but if we don't have Worm King or Worm Victory, there may not be a point in playing them.
We have both of the Worm monsters.
I wouldn't make none of those 2 decks, there are others good archetypes that are better and doesn't see much play like Nephthys for example, you can try and mix it with the recent Fire King support we had with the last structure deck.
Magnets, Mermails, Lavals, Machina, Flabed, World Legacy, Gladiator Beasts are just a few I can come up with right now, all of them are barely even played and you can come up with a different build or a different strategy while still being viable and not getting crushed on the process
They do seem to have more support between the two.
They do, and they have some good options to deal with backrow thanks to Lakeside Lady and Dustflame, but they can be pretty slow especially by today standards and consistency is also a problem, I used them like 2 months ago or so and they did suffer from that, plenty of duels with bricky hands and whenever I had Molten Conduction Field I didn't draw into Laval Cannon and vice versa