Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They've already changed older cards rather than releasing new ones. Why wouldn't they change an old ruling?
Errata changes like on Sangan and Dark Magician of Chaos make them playable, even though the original cards are no longer usable. So is there any harm in reverting an old ruling?
Exactly. I think it's a harsh limitation for no real reason. It won't have any real impact on the main game and in Duel Links it would only make Harpies a rogue strategy at best (like the anti-Amazoness deck using Wildheart and Tenkabito Shien).