Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3136135539&fileuploadsuccess=1
Just a reminder, I'm sure that Amelia's attitude isn't just a her thing, but a general one that all Aperture Scientists held towards non-organics. Secondly, Sterling was trying to kill the both of you, she could've said worse.
Conly doesn't seem to consider AI actual sentience.
How good would something like ChatGPT have to get at simulating a real person before you respect it?
Even more than this, Stirling treats you with respect and promises to help you when you help him... Then when you're about to go help Conly, he recognizes you're tossing him away and are going to stop his plan, which is to rebuild his home which was taken from him by.... A human.
Honestly, I think it's fair for Stirling to have trust issues and difficulty valuing life considering the trauma he was put through when treated as non-sentient. Humans have consistently screwed him over, and just when a human seems like they're about to help him, whoops, you're siding with Conly to break his big teleporter now.
Yeah it's fair for Stirling to have trust issues! And the point of my post was pointing out how Amelia's attitude could represent how all of Aperture treated non-organics! And how that easily led to GLaDOS! (Plus, how Stirling's attitude itself lead to the ending)
Though you also have to take into account that he's...also wrong. It's obvious from his dialogue in the chambers that you might not be the first person he's put through this, but you are the first person to reach the teleporter.
Plus, he doesn't seem to think critically, at ALL. He intends to let you go to the surface, but he was also intending to wake up GLaDOS; Those are two contradictory goals considering that he KNEW what she did to the humans in the facility. Also, he doesn't actually have a basis for trying to kill the main character besides his paranoia (and trust issues) when you show back up again, alive, with a new portal gun and another core.
(Showing up with a new core could play into his trust issues again, seeing that he's been replaced)
Also, for all the help Stirling wanted from you, he didn't seem to want to help you that much when you were in old Aperture, though he might not've known you were down there. But I also doubt that claim somewhat because he was siphoning materials from down there as well.
Also not including the fact that him trying to "fix" the teleporter was a fools errand! Notice that even before the boss fight, the core was rapidly destroying itself after it's activation! Aperture shut the project down (Which he knew about) and he didn't stop to think "What could be the consequences of a massive teleportation project going wrong" (Take a look at the ending even! You end up on the moon!